1476/5000
I am reading your messages
I find it more logical to answer in general.
I'm not a developer,
as someone who only uses TCL
for the solution of the problems experienced
I am writing bug reports to the forum.
I am writing with google translation like you,
English is not my mother tongue!
to use the language translation engine in a universal way;
There are 2 basic rules.
Rule number 1 - correctly defining an expression in one line
Rule number 2 - to the end of each line; If (.) or (,) is placed,
the translation engine translates better.
If the main subject is returned;
TCL is one of the best linux distributions I've been looking for for many years,
but the development process is more efficient with a kind of compatibility process.
my personal comment;
as desktop interface
"windowmaker" works more efficiently
(its own bar plugin is more compatible) but not compatible with WBAR,
these can be developed over time.
Localized exfat support is important especially in new versions of the kernel.
TCL 12 or above may have the desired maturity.
For now, I do not think TCL 11.1 fully meets realistic expectations.
a structure that works especially on the ram disk
especially in data writing processes on USB or SD card
Since the limiting structure of FAT32 does not provide the desired comfort completely
I think that TCL will be stronger with exfat support.
in this respect, ezremaster update
It will be more logical to prepare for TCL 12 series.