WelcomeWelcome | FAQFAQ | DownloadsDownloads | WikiWiki

Author Topic: wget  (Read 3226 times)

Offline cast-fish

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1000
  • hi there
wget
« on: September 03, 2012, 08:46:43 PM »
Hello

Do you know of any apps that are similar to "wget" but maybe lightweight more?

can you tell me, thanks


V.

Offline gerald_clark

  • TinyCore Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4254
Re: wget
« Reply #1 on: September 03, 2012, 09:13:37 PM »
How can anything be more "lightweight" than something that is already built into the supplied busybox?

Offline spence91

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 80
Re: wget
« Reply #2 on: September 04, 2012, 11:04:15 AM »
netcat?

Wget is already pretty basic. Even curl is a step up.

Offline coreplayer2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3020
Re: wget
« Reply #3 on: September 04, 2012, 11:16:48 AM »
For compatability I use the GNU Wget full version  (in repository) but it's certainly not more lightweight, but works great for me 
« Last Edit: September 04, 2012, 09:29:00 PM by coreplayer2 »

Offline tinypoodle

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3857
Re: wget
« Reply #4 on: September 04, 2012, 09:21:55 PM »
I can't follow how GNU wget would be more leightweight.
As for compatibility, GNU wget has proven to show incompatibility issues in the past, documented in several posts in this forum.

The question from Reply #2 has remained unanswered so far...
"Software gets slower faster than hardware gets faster." Niklaus Wirth - A Plea for Lean Software (1995)

Offline coreplayer2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3020
Re: wget
« Reply #5 on: September 04, 2012, 09:28:27 PM »
You are correct, sorry a typo..  corrected

if something doesn't sound quite right, then it probably isn't..
« Last Edit: September 04, 2012, 09:37:32 PM by coreplayer2 »