bmarkus:
Thank you! It works great
I think I am happy now function-wise, except for the left-handed mouse issue,
The only thing I could do now is to improve the performance once up and running. I am thinking about using copy mode (copyfs) on a few selected applications. This is what OnBoot and OnDemand looks like right now,
OnBoot - xmms, alsa, kmaps
OnDemand - audacious
Would it be a good idea to use copyfs on all of them or just on, say, xmms? Would it improve "snappiness" much? Are their dependencies loaded into RAM as well? What do you think?
Also, what is Xfbdev? Is it another server for X, even more lightweight than Xvesa, or what? If that is the case, would it improve performance much to switch to Xfbdev?
My thoughts:
- The documentation for Tiny Core could be improved a lot, trust me
- I would like to use audacious instead of xmms, but it seems to crash my computer. Please fix that.
- I am not overly impressed with the boot performance of Tiny Core 3.5. Adding "alsa" to "OnBoot" and setting it up during boot seems to increase the boot time a lot. Booting now takes almost precisely 2 minutes on this machine. There are versions of Puppy that are as fast, or faster than that. For example,
- Puppy 2.14X works great on old hardware (i586), has a modern feel to it, and is actively developed. It boots almost as fast as Tiny Core 3.5 on this machine while having a lot of apps pre-installed. Not quite as snappy when running though, but that is no surprise.
- PULP 0.10, a puplet for Puppy. It is extremely fast both with regards to booting and running. It mainly has a lot of older, but extremely lightweight apps. It looks like shit, but it boots in about 60s on this machine. How about that for an old Pentium 1, 200MHz?
My comments are not meant as something bad, but as something constructive. I am in love with Tiny Core already
EDIT: Thank you roberts! Thank you THANK YOU! Now I even have a left-handed serial mouse.
I am overly happy with Tiny Core. But I am also proud of myself
A few days ago I did barely know about Tiny Core, and now I have set up a fairly complex installation on a really old computer, a Pentium 1. I cannot be too stupid, hahaha. But that is NOTHING compared to the guys behind Tiny Core. Keep up the good work!