WelcomeWelcome | FAQFAQ | DownloadsDownloads | WikiWiki
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: RFC: unified extension naming convention  (Read 6564 times)

Offline roberts

  • Retired Admins
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7361
  • Founder Emeritus
Re: RFC: unified extension naming convention
« Reply #15 on: December 08, 2009, 06:40:07 PM »
Will be offered for testing beginning with 2.7rc1.
Logged
10+ Years Contributing to Linux Open Source Projects.

Offline jpeters

  • Restricted
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1017
Re: RFC: unified extension naming convention
« Reply #16 on: December 08, 2009, 10:11:59 PM »
Quote from: bmarkus on December 07, 2009, 05:57:06 PM
It is more simple. Regarding .tczl a single unconditional ldconfig is enough after all extensions loaded and before startup scripts executed.

This is the first time someone thought of this?  What about for individual installs?
« Last Edit: December 08, 2009, 10:18:36 PM by jpeters »
Logged

Offline roberts

  • Retired Admins
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7361
  • Founder Emeritus
Re: RFC: unified extension naming convention
« Reply #17 on: December 08, 2009, 10:38:42 PM »
Currently during boot there is only a single call to ldconfig and/or depmod based on a flag setting via the extension's extension. The change would be based on a directory test rather than said extension.
Logged
10+ Years Contributing to Linux Open Source Projects.
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »