General TC > Programming & Scripting - Unofficial
Duplicate the scripts that convert different distributions to the TCL package.
xor:
There is a proverb: "A lazy man is a smart man."
Of course, I don't know how Google Translate will translate this.
I'm not saying we should burn the libraries.
My suggestion is a different perspective;
For example, Firefox constantly receives so many updates;
a tiny core developer turned this into a fully automatic update reduction .sh file,
Is this a successful trial?
The answer to the question is; yes, successful :)
Can this model be predicted for other popular applications?
The answer to the question is; Yes
Am I asking for the impossible here?
The answer to the question is; No,
question ; So, What is the problem ?
I want tiny core linux to reach larger audiences.
But what is the purpose here? Should we keep this as a distribution that tastes like a nostalgic computer friendship club stuck between the 80s and 90s?
We all have limited time due to our work lives;
or even if we are retired; We have a limited life.
Why don't we focus on things that will make things easier!?
The person who came up with the .sh script structure and I think is no longer alive.
People who work hard to make things easier in life and who want things to advance technologically; He left a legacy of humanity to humanity.
I don't understand anything about firefox's automatic installation script.
But when I ask the artificial intelligence to read this and explain it line by line,
The picture has become a little more understandable.
It worked partially when I asked it to produce an alternative,
Then it gave an unknown error somewhere.
If only ai could do this job perfectly.
Currently in the script section of the forum;
The automatic update scripts I would send would be very popular. Let's see if artificial intelligence is promising in this regard.
The future of programming is already changing since it may take longer than a normal person's life to maintain the open source codes developed by 1000s of programmers.
It is now obvious that advanced programming will be handled by artificial intelligence!
I don't see tiny core linux as a linux distribution.
I perceive and evaluate it as a different GNU architecture.
Perhaps tomorrow, this system architecture will be able to work with a different non-Linux kernel, and we should consider Linux alternatives that are more efficient, smaller and consume less RAM.
In this respect, tiny core linux may turn into a name like tiny core gnu in the future, due to its philosophy. Maybe this could happen a generation later.
I think what brings us all together here is the philosophy of the work and the event.
CentralWare:
@xor:
--- Quote ---Am I asking for the impossible here?
--- End quote ---
Yes, actually, you are.
The lazy man has no job - thus no income - thus no responsibilities to mention.
The lazy man has free time to do what you ask if only he was not so lazy as to learn for himself what's required to accomplish it.
Since he possesses no skills to do as you've asked, he's too smart for his own good - or anyone else's, and so what you've asked goes undone.
Including the kernel and BusyBox, there are more than 3,000 pieces that make up just Tiny Core Linux 14x64.
Each build script would take anywhere from 30 minutes to ~5 hours to build depending on how many obstacles I'd face for each one. On occasion, it's quite a bit longer - especially on large, multi-faceted packages where vast amounts of tracing and debugging comes into play. Pretending for a moment this were legitimate, I would invest no more than four people on a semi-full-time basis thus an average of four build scripts theoretically would be completed each work day. There are roughly 250 work days in a calendar year; as such we would require three years to accomplish this task with four technicians.
Our shop rate varies, but averages $130/hr for IT development. Please understand, other people charge more... some charge less.
Emphasis: this does not include the platforms for x86, aarch, ARM, etc. -- only PC 64-bit.
For those of us with responsibilities, I can close this conversation once and for all by asking one simple question:
Of the $390,000.00 USD (plus tax, VAT or what ever evil takes your money) it is estimated to cost to accomplish what you've personally asked for,
How will you be paying for this development contract? Cash is a universal language. The lazy man doesn't have any of his own.
xor:
As always, I'm trying to explain something with Google Translate.
(The 3rd world war will break out on the lies of news channels.)
We are discussing a philosophy here.
Everyone here makes an effort.
Even I may not be able to take care of a problem.
But sometimes a good question is better than a good answer. !
A script makes things a lot easier.
And by the way, your overreaction
From the prediction that artificial intelligence may put software developers in a really difficult situation in the future
I sensed a justified reaction.
Artificial intelligence will do coding in the future
As for the reasons?
I used artificial intelligence to print a program.
When I say make it smaller and run faster
translated the codes into ASM language.
the codes seem too long
When I say deduplicate to simplify this.
What emerged was a work that could not be written by human hands,
but was created by a machine produced by human hands in theory and practice.
It introduced coding with the smallest size and fastest system access.
no future library knowledge
Those who explain in an understandable language what they create in their imagination,
It seems like it will shape the future.
(of course; this is a dream for now)
CentralWare:
...ooO(Did anyone here say anything at all, let alone over-react about AI taking over or putting us in a predicament of any kind at all?)
gadget42:
this thread reminded me of something i read a while back
https://easyos.org/dev/how-to-compile-a-linux-distribution-from-source.html
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version