WelcomeWelcome | FAQFAQ | DownloadsDownloads | WikiWiki
« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Common Lisp or emacs lisp  (Read 1761 times)

Offline limeblack

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 69
Common Lisp or emacs lisp
« on: September 17, 2015, 11:48:25 PM »
Does anyone know if common lisp or emacs lisp can be installed?

It looks like emacs is a no go http://forum.tinycorelinux.net/index.php/topic,13528.msg74973.html#msg74973

I guess Clojure is okay, but have a feeling it will be a little slower.

I'm just looking for some type of lisp.
Logged

Offline Juanito

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14819
Re: Common Lisp or emacs lisp
« Reply #1 on: September 18, 2015, 02:34:57 AM »
That post didn't say that emacs couldn't be installed, just that nobody felt like doing it...

Why not give it a go yourself?

Edit: Maybe gnu common lisp is worth a try?
« Last Edit: September 18, 2015, 02:44:14 AM by Juanito »
Logged

Offline beerstein

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 530
Re: Common Lisp or emacs lisp
« Reply #2 on: September 18, 2015, 09:10:58 AM »
there is a LISP interpreter available in Public Domain for DOS. May be you could try to run this Lisp inside dosbox?
Logged
t(w)o be(ers) or not t(w)o be(ers) that is the question

Offline aw

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 45
Re: Common Lisp or emacs lisp
« Reply #3 on: September 18, 2015, 11:29:40 AM »
There is also
Code: [Select]
picolisp available in x86_64 - http://repo.tinycorelinux.net/6.x/x86_64/tcz/picolisp.tcz.info
Logged
github.com/aw
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »