Welcome
|
FAQ
|
Downloads
|
Wiki
Tiny Core Linux
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email
?
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
News:
Learn Tiny Core. View Tiny Core
Screen Shots and Videos
.
Home
Help
Login
Register
Tiny Core Linux
»
Off-Topic
»
Off-Topic - Tiny Core Lounge
»
musl versus libc, toybox versus busybox?
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Author
Topic: musl versus libc, toybox versus busybox? (Read 5264 times)
nick65go
Hero Member
Posts: 839
musl versus libc, toybox versus busybox?
«
on:
March 23, 2013, 06:26:38 PM »
Hi, could you have a look at
http://landley.net/aboriginal
?
It is about a move to a new small C library, and a new small busybox replacment.
it is still work in progress, but it is the spirit of minimal kernel, library, and shell, same as (Tiny)core goal.
Logged
curaga
Administrator
Hero Member
Posts: 11048
Re: musl versus libc, toybox versus busybox?
«
Reply #1 on:
March 24, 2013, 04:19:02 AM »
Musl still has incompatibilities, and toybox lacks a lot of busybox features. These would prevent using them in TC. IIRC musl has been discussed before here.
IMHO toybox was started for the wrong reasons (licence, to avoid the GPL).
Logged
The only barriers that can stop you are the ones you create yourself.
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Tiny Core Linux
»
Off-Topic
»
Off-Topic - Tiny Core Lounge
»
musl versus libc, toybox versus busybox?