Off-Topic > SCM EXtensions
SCM Basics
Jason W:
Memory efficiency? But look at the scm vs tcz findings above. There really is not much a difference, if not an advantage of self contained as provided thus far, given the above findings on the existing scm apps. Sure, some things need to exist in the system as a low level shared app or daemon. But for gtk2 and other apps as provided thus far, there really is not so much a disadvantage.
Each has their own benefits, but if upon findings of real memory disadvantages, then that can be addressed by changes in approach of the self contained method.
gerald_clark:
Window managers would require symlinks outside of the /apps directory.
Jason W:
As Gerald mentioned, WM's require base functions outside of /apps that make them best suited to remain tcz's, and they tend to be fairly small anyway.
curaga:
I don't think compiletc would work as a scm, it would require a ton of symlinks still.
floppy:
I did not catch the main target of it and the use target.
run a session with only 256MB RAM, no swap, for installing a system with it..?
What is the main reason?.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version