WelcomeWelcome | FAQFAQ | DownloadsDownloads | WikiWiki

Author Topic: Could be [tiny]core improved?  (Read 48484 times)

Offline Leee

  • Wiki Author
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 240
Re: Could be [tiny]core improved?
« Reply #75 on: October 25, 2026, 04:20:39 AM »
What version of openwrt are you guys running?  I have it installed on my little Linksys router and I can get into it via either the browser or ssh.

core 17.1 x86_64, jwm

Offline CNK

  • Wiki Author
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 470
Re: Could be [tiny]core improved?
« Reply #76 on: October 25, 2026, 05:42:16 PM »
I'm running OpenWRT 23, but like I say the Telnet server is a static binary I compiled myself so the openWRT version isn't that relevent. My router was always too "tiny" to install the web interface, but I could use SSH. However Telnet avoids the inevitable problem of SSH clients updating one day and suddenly not wanting to connect to it anymore. I also have FTP installed for file transfer. I built a custom installation image to flash onto it with those and other customisations.

Offline neonix

  • Wiki Author
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 634
Re: Could be [tiny]core improved?
« Reply #77 on: Today at 10:32:09 AM »
If you don't have telnet, or SSH on your router, you can use ftp to configure many services like tftp or http server. Simply edit text file in midnight commander with F4. Midnight commander has build in ftp client and txt file editor.