Tiny Core Linux
Off-Topic => Archive / Obsolete => Release Candidate Testing => Topic started by: roberts on January 29, 2011, 03:01:04 PM
-
The First Release Candidate of Micro Core v3.5 is now posted and ready for testing.
http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/linux/distributions/tinycorelinux/3.x/release_candidates/microcore
microcore_3.5rc1.iso
microcore_3.5rc1.iso.md5.txt
Change log for Micro Core v3.5:
* Clean up of tce-audit 'delete' spurious messages.
* New tce-remove support for tce-audit/appsaudit.
* Moved thinkpad_acpi.ko from base to extension.
* Updated tc-config crond call and removed duplicate crond script.
* Updated busybox 1.18.1 plus patches.
* Scripts adjusted to remove extra spaces to reduce size.
* fsck replaced with busybox fsck
* zsync upgraded to 0.6.2.
* Changed all core components from .gz to tcz.
(Note need to add them to onboot.lst, order is important.)
-
Looks good.
I am already using gzs converted to tczs in my optional directory.
I was wondering if the rc core components could have rc in their names.
Ex: Xprogs-rc.tcz
I use symlinks to share optional between release and release-candidate tce directories.
-
Particularly using "rc" as suffix of files unrelated to 'run commands' might potentially lead to confusion.
Perhaps "-rel" or something else might be less problematic.
-
Perhaps "-rel" or something else might be less problematic.
Well... "-rel" would seem to lose the "condidate" part. I like the idea of using some kind of signal, though. How about something indicating to -which- rc it applies, for the benefit of those of us who don't do cleanup diligently? Something like Xprogs-3.5rc1.tcz
-
* Changed all core components from .gz to tcz.
(Note need to add them to onboot.lst, order is important.)
What should the order be? If this is indeed important, it could perhaps be mentioned in the OP?
-
I only mentioned it because .gzs load before tczs. So to emulate prior setup place new tczs before existing tczs.
-
Perhaps intended, but after using "sudo tce-setup" and starting x and also rebooting with Xprogs, Xlibs, Xvesa, flwm, wbar in onboot.lst in that order, the screen background is black/blank.
Using panel/wallpaper/colour and chosing any colour brings back the screen background and tinycore logo.
[all this with no backup]
-
Thanks for reporting. Fixed and reposted Xprogs.tcz
http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/linux/distributions/tinycorelinux/3.x/release_candidates/microcore/
-
fixed :)