Tiny Core Linux

Tiny Core Base => TCB Talk => Topic started by: jls on January 06, 2011, 05:37:13 AM

Title: appsaudit behaviour in case of copy2fs
Post by: jls on January 06, 2011, 05:37:13 AM

in case the extensions are copied to the fs:

• update apps could immediatly change the tcz instead of using the update dir (the one under optional).
• mark for deletion could immediatly delete the extensions instead of doing this during the shutdown process

Title: Re: appsaudit behaviour in case of copy2fs
Post by: tinypoodle on January 06, 2011, 06:31:18 AM

A mechanism to check if any of the files concerned are in use would be required (fuser?, lsof[not in base]?)

Title: Re: appsaudit behaviour in case of copy2fs
Post by: jls on January 06, 2011, 07:47:06 AM

actually all the unmounted extensions could be processed as I wrote on the 1° post

Title: Re: appsaudit behaviour in case of copy2fs
Post by: tinypoodle on January 06, 2011, 07:49:54 AM

Disregard my last post, I had misunderstood.

Title: Re: appsaudit behaviour in case of copy2fs
Post by: roberts on January 06, 2011, 08:05:05 AM

I always find it fascinating that someone posts about what I am working on.

In an effort to promote the use of ondemand I have just completed the support of removing said extensions (unmounted) without the need to reboot. Look for it in 3.5.

Some developers like to blog about their activities, I would rather develop.

Title: Re: appsaudit behaviour in case of copy2fs
Post by: hiro on January 06, 2011, 10:27:44 AM

heh, I've implemented the same thing here for a test, but forgot about it because I had to develop other stuff;)