Tiny Core Linux
Tiny Core Extensions => TCE Talk => Extension requests => Topic started by: SamK on November 01, 2010, 05:37:38 AM
-
It seems that Opera now natively supports Flash blocking via On-Demand-Plugin (ODP).
http://www.rarst.net/software/opera-on-demand-plugin/
In my view, this feature alone is worth an update.
-
It is possible (again, as it used to be up to a certain version with qt static builds) with recent versions of opera to just untar the downloaded .tar.bz2 and simply run it out of the directory. qt is no longer required.
With the versions in repo it is possible to globally disable plugins and then make exceptions in site preferences. In addition, personally I have added a button to status bar to toggle plugins on/off.
When opera10 is in turbo mode the feature with a graphical play button is already implemented.
In order to always get a play button in the versions currently in opera, one could use a third party javascript or .css providing such.
-
1. My user javascripts don't work if I globally disable javascript
2. enabling plugins per site preferences is the greatest thing I could imagine, but sadly it's way too much of a hassle to click through the menus (minimum of 5 clicks).
3. often I only want one flash element activated (I don't remember having ever wanted to use two at the same page)
-
1. My user javascripts don't work if I globally disable javascript
2. enabling plugins per site preferences is the greatest thing I could imagine, but sadly it's way too much of a hassle to click through the menus (minimum of 5 clicks).
3. often I only want one flash element activated (I don't remember having ever wanted to use two at the same page)
1. Personally I rarely enable javascript globally and I don't always use user javascript.
However, I think to remember that with javascript globally disabled, user javascript would work on sites which would be excepted by site preferences. I don't think flash content could ever work when javascript is not enabled.
2. That is a bit of work at the beginning, which becomes gradually less with time, and I believe it is an investment which pays off multiply over the long. With a toggle button it is one click.
3. (Dis-)allowing of single flash elements can be achieved in 3 ways:
a. third party flashblocker (.js or .css)
b. in opera 10.tcz native while in turbo mode
c. downloading a recent version, native. see first 2 posts of thread.
-
Opera 11 is out!
-
Opera 11 is out!
http://forum.tinycorelinux.net/index.php?topic=6345.msg43665#msg43665
-
Opera 11.50 is out!
http://www.osnews.com/story/24897/Opera_11_50_Released
-
the latest opera-next (alias opera12) is out, I have made an opera12.tcz of 11.62MB (versus opera10 of 11.21 MB);
see their http://my.opera.com/desktopteam/blog/
all I did was to delete some locale from the http://snapshot.opera.com/unix/QRESYNC_12.00-1033/opera-next-12.00-1033.i386.linux.tar.xz
in opera12.tcz.dep is only fontconfig.tcz, but it works very fast and is adapted to wide display (netbook) because most of menu and bars could be hided. it seems to me faster than firefox.tcz ver 5.0.1 of 16.42MB, and flash10 works very good; the customization menu of opera12 is as rich as firefox menu;
shame that it is close source, but i could live with it :-[
-
the latest opera-next (alias opera12) is out, I have made an opera12.tcz of 11.62MB (versus opera10 of 11.21 MB);
see their http://my.opera.com/desktopteam/blog/
all I did was to delete some locale from the http://snapshot.opera.com/unix/QRESYNC_12.00-1033/opera-next-12.00-1033.i386.linux.tar.xz
in opera12.tcz.dep is only fontconfig.tcz, but it works very fast and is adapted to wide display (netbook) because most of menu and bars could be hided. it seems to me faster than firefox.tcz ver 5.0.1 of 16.42MB, and flash10 works very good; the customization menu of opera12 is as rich as firefox menu;
shame that it is close source, but i could live with it :-[
Will you make it available in the repository for others to use? (I think you should name it operanext.tcz)
-
yes; because is my first tcz, I had to read again the:
http://wiki.tinycorelinux.net/wiki:creating_extensions and http://wiki.tinycorelinux.net/wiki:iconmenuinfo;
EDIT: audited opera-next.tcz (11.53MB) with submitqc, then created the archive and then bcrypt it (using the password "tinycore"); menu and submenus are working from Applications, icon apears in wbar;
opera-next.tar.gz.bfe sent to tcesubmit_at_gmail_dot_com; enjoy it :)
-
Hmm, I'm not really sure that we really need such a thing as an 'opera-next.tcz' extension (in particular one that shows on it's own 'about:opera' page that it is only "pre-alpha").
The Opera team is pushing out their "bleeding edge" releases fairly frequently (sometimes multiple times in a week) and announce them via their blog (http://my.opera.com/desktopteam/blog/). In my view calling it now 'Opera-next' instead of an alpha or beta release is just the "flavour of the month" following in the trails of Chrome and FireFox with their different "channels" etc.
Looking at the repository where I can spot an outdated 'firefox-beta.tcz' (of v4.0rc1) whilst the (stable) 'firefox.tcz' is v5.0.1 just shows (at least IMHO) how futile it can be trying to chase more than just a current stable browser release.
My suggestion would be to remove the outdated 'firefox-beta.tcz' and not include an 'opera-next.tcz' in the repository. I could see the point in having something like "FF-beta" when the development cycle was considerably longer (e.g. 13 month between FF 3.6 and FF 4.0), but nowadays in the current climate of much shorter "gestation" periods, I'm not so sure about that.
I'm aware that there exists a "hidden" 'opera11.tcz' extension in the repository. As far as I can tell it is hidden as it lacks an 'opera11.tcz.info' file (which prevents it's inclusion in 'info.lst'). That is not a big loss in my view as it contains the already outdated release 11.11 as the current stable release is 11.50. It might be worthwhile to create a "proper", up-to-date 'opera11.tcz' extension.
On that note I wonder why the latest stable release should not be called 'opera.tcz' and the (trusted) old 'opera.tcz' (i.e. v9.64) be renamed to 'opera9.tcz'. I'd like to think that would be more reasonable, as it might surprise some users that something that is more than two years old pretends to be "fresh". Furthermore I don't really see a need for keeping a 'opera10.tcz' extension around, as that was IMHO anyway not such a great effort.
For those (presumably few) users that want to trial the Opera alpha or beta releases this process has since about a year been pretty simple: download, extract, (install the one or two dependencies like 'libxft.tcz') and just run it (e.g. in the extraction directory). Sure that is not automatically persistent, but there were quite some "dud" releases that did not quite work, so who wants those to be an extension? Plus the overhead for the repository maintainers with that sort of churn might not really be required.
OTOH, for users that want to create a (private ?) extension I'm attaching here a script that could be used to create such. It just requires to either change some variables at the top of the script or call it with a suitable URL (for downloading a new release) as parameter. It should then be able to create an appropriately named extension (plus a '*-locale.tcz' one).
Note: It has been successfully tested against the current stable (i.e. v11.50) and 'opera-next' releases, but I'm not sure for how long that will be the case into the future.
EDIT 1: As I tried to upload a 2834 bytes script I've received a The upload folder is full. Please try a smaller file and/or contact an administrator. message back from the SMF system. So I'm going to attach the script later ...
EDIT 2: The script has now been attached and a silly misspelling corrected.
-
Maro, I think you are right. Personally I would prefer an updated, stable Opera.tcz. I've now installed Opera11.tcz and it seems to work fine, thanks for letting us know of its existence.
Regards
/Uggla
-
it is OK for me to do not send/update anymore opera-next.tcz; It was fun to try my hand at creating menu/sub-menu in flwm Application menu, as the wiki is incomplete about submenu tricks :P
I did this because opera10 was old, and not know about opera11 existence;
I would like that your newer operaXX.tcz to have proper working submenus, take out the bloat from it (locales, not 48x48 icons, personalized/better default speed dials, etc) if it is not too hard for you to assemble such a script.
thanks for your feedback.
-
maro-
Where is the firefox-dev.tcz extension? I don't see it when I log into the server, nor in appbrowser.
I also agree that I don't like the "opera-next" name, I would prefer an opera-beta instead. But if they release an update to it even once a week, then it would be futile to try to keep it current, which would defeat the purpose of a beta version.
And since I maintain firefox, current minefield, seamonkey, icecat, as well as keeping the older 4.0.x, 3.6.x, and 3.5.x firefox builds at their latest point release (some folks like older versions, more memory efficient and less feature creep), I would rather spend my time keeping those up to date than to keep beta versions around, so firefox-beta I dropped from the repo.
-
Where is the firefox-dev.tcz extension? I don't see it when I log into the server, nor in appbrowser.
A pretty silly mistake at my end, I meant of course 'firefox-beta.tcz'.
Jason, any thoughts about a re-naming exercise where for example 'opera.tcz' would reflect the latest stable release and not the oldest (which could be possibly extended to the 'minefield*.tcz' as well)?
Furthermore, the promised script has now been added to reply #10.
-
I reckon that similar to firefox.tcz, minefield.tcz and opera.tcz could be the latest stable versions. While the older ones would be named minefield4.tcz and such.
But since there would be minefields with the major version number in their name, it still may result in some confusion. It would require changing the build script and creating the extension with a version name in it when it is moved to the previous release.
It is doable, and I like the version numbers to differentiate between custom firefox version instead of using the release codes like namoroka, shiretoko, etc, which makes it hard for new users to find and keep up with the latest custom firefox.
Since opera.tcz and minefield.tcz are Curaga's, I would like to see what he thinks on it. I am ok either way, with our current path or with making opera.tcz/minefield.tcz the current release.
-
I'm fine with that. What should minefield be renamed to though? Aren't there other 3.n firefoxes around?
edit: opera.tcz renamed to opera9.tcz.
-
I guess minefield3.tcz would do, as the other existing 3.x is called granparadiso.
The bad thing I see with doing this with minefield is it would take a rebuild and a renaming of internal files like icons and .desktop to move a version from minefield.tcz to minefield(ver#).tcz.
If a newcomer types either firefox or minefield into appbrowser, they will see a list of minefields and the highest version number would seem like the obvious choice. Upon further thought, I lean towards keeping major version numbers in the names to save a lot of work over the long run. I will think some more on it.
-
I just looked up minefield's .info and mozilla's minefield description and since both say something else I'm now unsure about what minefield actually is and whether I should want to use this or the normal firefox.tcz instead.
-
Yeah, we could just name all multiple-versions extensions with the major version, it would be clear too.
@hiro: Mozilla considers it beta builds, but it's the default unofficial branding in releases too.
-
nice to watch the discussion; in the mean time my opera12 does its job for me;
this is because (both in tc 3.8rc1 and tc 3.8rc3) the appbrowser shows (right after connect, in the left panel) only opera9.tcz, opera10.tcz, opera9-locale.tcz, opera10-locale.tcz, but no opera11*
if I enter "opera" (without quotes) or "opera11" and push the Search button, then nothing shows; Only when I type "opera11" (who to tell me this name?) and push Provides button, then opera11.tcz and opera11_locale.tcz show in left panel; hmmm; not a pleasure to hunt like this;
plus now even when opera11* are temporary listed in left panel, click on opera9* and opera11* does not show anything, only opera10* show the info/files/dep/size
initialy, just after connect, both oper9* and oper10* show all info correctly;
/opt/tcemirror has http://distro.ibiblio.org/tinycorelinux/
you are welcome to move this message to appbrowser bug topic if you think is not a misconfiguration on web server;
-
Both opera 11 extensions are missing their .info files.
AppBowser uses a master list based on .info files.
It is mandatory for extension submissions to include the .info.
-
opera11.tcz is also does not display the EULA one has to agree before running opera.
There was a miscommunication in the gmail thread that resulted in the broken extension being uploaded. I normally allow the uploader and the extension maker a chance to respond to issues, but since there has not been a response to the several mentions here in the forum about the missing info file, I will remove the extension pending a corrected one. Mainly due to it's not adhering to license requirements - the display of the EULA - but also awaiting an info file.
-
until someone will find few minutes (or hours, days?) to update the opera##.tcz to ver 11-12, my opera-next.tcz could temporary lives in repository (easy to delete later) as an intermediate solution; btw, it shows EULA on 1-st time use ::)
I do not wish to push things, but for me an imperfect solution is better than a non existing one;
Nobody can guaranty that an tcz extension will be updated further by the original owner;
history is full of samples that sheet happens, but if it is so easy to modify/create it (as this post history suggest) anybody could take over on the fly; you may even not mention my name in the info;
I was just trying to give something back to community, based on principle: first solve a problem, then maybe improve the solution;
-
Especially with the absence of opera11, opera-next will be uploaded. A current stable opera extension would be good to see also. We can later decide on the name of the beta version or if we want to keep a beta around once a recent stable one is uploaded.
-
Oh, I didn't realize "opera-next" was the actual name of the alpha/beta of opera. It is the official name, and the extension works nicely, adobe flash and all seamlessly. Everything is there and is working fine here with my limited testing.
Having this extension does not detract from any of the other operas, and if it is maintained on a reasonable basis, I think it is nice to have.
-
Hello
sorry to ask such a a basic question, but
Is there any "Opera" extension from the TCL store that
simply works correctly with the Flash extension from the app store?
(by simply installing both)
I have found the above situation to not be the case. Consequently i have not used Opera.
If the answer is now yes, to the above question, then which Opera extension is it?
thanks
V.
-
If you follow the instructions in the getflash10 info file, it will work with the opera extension
-
@vinceASPECT
did you try the opera-next with only OSS (for sound) and updated flash10 (for video)? i think flash10.tcz is 10.3.181 (if I not extracted it from archlinux). maybe you should run again getflash...
-
Is opera-next not dependent on gtk or qt? How does this work?
-
@hiro
opera-next does not depend on qt or gtk; I think those are statically linked inside, because ldd shows that it depends only on libfontconfig (and recursively on expat2). This is the "beauty" who tempted me to make it an extension. Before I submitted it, I have checked this by booting TC with base and norestore bootcodes of course.
-
@hiro
They dropped qt after 10.5, and are using their own rendering engine. It can use gtk, or kdelibs for theming if available, but doesn't require them.
-
So it uses gtk just because flash gets loaded, I see.
-
Uh
i just seem to remember doing the following.
installing "Opera 10" then installing flash and running getflash
but Opera didn't show any flash content after that. It didn't work.
Contrary to what happens with other similar browsers, where Flash just seems to work right after the scenario above.
(minefield, midori, Epiphany, Chrome etc etc)
that's what i recall.
Vince.
-
Hi vinceASPECT
I'm running Opera v10.10 and flash didn't work for me the first time I tried to install it. It did work
the second time I tried, after I read the instructions on the Info tab for getFlash10.tcz
-
fyi, i did not try out opera 11.50 final, but i have started opera-next without flash installed; in a web page i see a place-holder for missing flash plug-in; i installed by on-demand the flash10, and the flash shows then in the web page, without need to restart opera; wow, it is nice behaver; few seconds gain for lazy people, especially when you do not setup opera to continue from last time;
-
Hi vinceASPECT
I'm running Opera v10.10 and flash didn't work for me the first time I tried to install it. It did work
the second time I tried, after I read the instructions on the Info tab for getFlash10.tcz
OK Rich, i will try that because Opera is a real nice browser. Do you think your idea will work with the very latest Opera in the tcl app store?
V.
-
Hi vinceASPECT
i just seem to remember doing the following.
installing "Opera 10" then installing flash and running getflash
The instructions state that you must have also run the browser at least once before running getflash.
The instructions also state that OSS sound must be installed and running before running getflash.
I think that second item may have given me some trouble since OSS does not work on my laptop. I
believe I had OSS installed and running for getflash and then replaced it with ALSA.
-
hi Rich
i indeed have followed the info file in the getflash.tcz instructions and then
tried installing Opera and Flash on a fresh TCL system
I also have OSS installed and working correctly. I have Pre-started browsers and everything.
Still, opera does not show flash content.
i'ts all the latest versions of files...
That is why i made my first comment on this thread about this topic.
Opera with Flash browsing does not work here on this laptop.
I noticed there is an entire thread in this forum explaining how to get Opera working with Flash. People in that thread also have problems. The thread is pretty unclear.....by the way.
hmmm....back to my OP.
V.
-
Hi vinceASPECT
Open a terminal and enter
find /usr -iname libflash*
ps | grep libflash
and post what they return.
-
Hi
Ok i will try the whole thing again from scratch....
if it doesn't work..
i will post the output here in this thread.... for the commands you mentioned
thanks a lot, because Opera is one of my favourite browsers because it's so fast.
It would be nice to use it properly
Vince.
-
Hi
Ok i will try the whole thing again from scratch....
if it doesn't work..
i will post the output here in this thread.... for the commands you mentioned
thanks a lot, because Opera is one of my favourite browsers because it's so fast.
It would be nice to use it properly
Vince.
Uh...i tried this stuff again and noticed that the tcl icon for Opera is a "low ram" version
of Opera. The Full version of Opera, must be run prior to installing Flash and that is done
by going to the tcl menu.
I have not yet tried this, but previously i was not running the Full Opera version prior to installing
flash.
i will try the whole thing again. Do you try these things from scratch in a virtual box?
Vince.
-
Hi vinceASPECT
I'm a little bit old school, I don't use those new fangled virtual thingamajigs.
-
Hello,
ha ha
No, it has not worked. Opera and Flash is not working.
I would go as far as to say, therefor, that nobody will get Opera and Flash working together by
looking at the tcz app store and just following normal procedure. This dysfunctionality is not the case with ALL other web browsers in the app store. All other web browsers work perfectly with Flash.
This laptop is no different to any other hardware...in that respect. Its a fresh Tcl and fresh downloads.
(do you ever test any of this stuff yourself?....with like a dummy TCL machine that is always virgin?)
here are the outputs of the commands you mentioned...
tc@box:~$ find /usr -iname libflash*
/usr/local/icecat/plugins/libflashplayer.so
/usr/local/firefox-official/plugins/libflashplayer.so
/usr/local/seamonkey/plugins/libflashplayer.so
/usr/local/firefox/plugins/libflashplayer.so
/usr/local/share/flash10/libflashplayer.so
/usr/local/share/flash10/libflashsupport.so
/usr/local/lib/mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.so
/usr/local/lib/opera/plugins/libflashplayer.so
/usr/lib/libflashsupport.so
find: /usr/lib/oss/save: Permission denied
/usr/lib/oss/lib/libflashsupport_32.so
/usr/lib/oss/lib/libflashsupport_32-ssl.so
the other command..
tc@box:~$ ps | grep libflash
3979 tc grep libflash
thanks
Vince.
-
Hi vinceASPECT
tc@box:~$ ps | grep libflash
3979 tc grep libflash
There's the problem, flash isn't running. Try this, shut down the browser, click on the desktop, go to
Applications or OnDemand, and click on flash10. Then restart the browser and see if it works.
-
you don't think it is some issue with OSS?
the terminal output shows "find"....and then something about
OSS
why wouldn't flash be running then?
it's never triggered into running when Opera browser starts?
thanks,
i will try your advice
Vince.
-
ye
i don't know what you mean
i don't have "flash10" in my applications menu
It's "getFlash10" and it seems to start just downloading flash again.
hmmm
i will have to start again from scratch.
i will try that instead......but it don't look like you say
Vince.
-
Hi vinceASPECT
The find command just displayed the various links to the flash libraries. The ps command shows that
the only process running that contained the text libflash was the grep command it was piped
through. If flash was running you would have gotten two responses from that ps command.
-
Hi vinceASPECT
Getflash10 is the script that gets the flash libraries and creates tcz file. Flash10 is the actual application
after it's installed. Maybe the application menu is not getting updated? Maybe you need to restart the
machine after running getflash10? I don't know.
-
hi
i don't know also.
If the menu is not getting updated....then i have no idea why. Its clean
boot of tcl from CD disc with no other software is present on the system..... just Opera
and Flash.
If the machine needs to be re-started after "getFlash10" is executed
then i guesse i can try that..
thanks
Vince.
-
getFlash10 does not require any further action to make use of flash after it is run, it is ready to go.
However, if you run the getFlash10 script when you already have in installed instance of flash.tcz, you do need to reboot as the installed instance of the flash extension is broken by the updated flash.tcz. I think I will add a check for this to the script that will prompt to cancel the rerunning of the script, or to allow the rerunning and updating of flash.tcz with a reminder to reboot to use the updated flash installation.
-
Hello
no there is no luck here with Opera 10 and Flash together....from the tcl app store.
In simple summary
Opera and Flash do not work correctly in Tinycore Linux.
Given that Opera has 40 million users and maybe 100 million users of OperaMobile, how many of those are Tinycore users? (answers on a postcard)
Many people like myself, may have wanted Opera inside tcl.
I have tried this stuff numerous times before .........and it's actually waisted quite a lot of my time.
Today i have had another go at this Opera stuff with completely fresh boots of TCL from CD disc.
Fresh systems with only Opera and Flash and OSS as the scenario. No other software
on the system.
I have tried everything as detailed in the info files and advice but nothing
gets Opera and Flash to work together in Tcl.
Like i said in the OP...
ALL other browsers from the tcl app store work correctly with Flash. (midori,minefield,chrome,Epiphany) butNOT Opera.
This is not the first time i have mentioned this...but it will be the last.
I can't think that anybody tests this stuff, otherwise they would notice that virgin tcl
systems and this Opera scenario fail to work successfully.
It does not point to my laptop having any issues...because ALL other browsers work with Flash.
Rich says that Flash is not even running on my tcl. Why would that be?....after following all info
file instructions?...i have no idea why that would be other than the simple answer that Opera is not compatable with Flash in Tinycore Linux.
anyhow
Vince.
-
@vinceASPECT
are you willing to stop complain, listen very carefully, and do exactly what i suggest to you? it is up to you in the end, thanks;So
1, first MOVE your existing flash10.tcz and flash10.tcz.dep somewhere out from tce/optional/
2; reboot TC with boot codes base and norestore;
3; after you are again in TC (maybe run startx -> for grafical interface)
4; from appbrowser load local opera-next and OSS
5; Only now load and run getflash10
4; now you should have a fresh tcz extension in tce/optional/; ckeck for it;
5, it will not be uploaded yet, neither in Ondemand menu; it is up to you to load it in RAM now only or forever to be in ondemand menu;
6 finaly (with OSS, opera-next and flash loaded, ckeck with control panel) now you can test the flash
good luck
-
Hi vinceASPECT
Both nick65go and I are running flash under Opera, so it does work. I noticed nick65go has flash
installed OnDemand instead of OnBoot, as do I. I'm running out of ideas, but if you want to try one
more thing, go to ControlPanel and open AppsAudit.
1. Onboot->Maintenance
2. In the right panel click on flash10
3. Onboot->Exit OnBoot
4. OnDemand->Maintenance
5. In the left panel find flash10 and click on it
6. OnDemand->Exit OnDemand
7. Reboot your machine
8. Click on the desktop and start flash10 from the OnDemand menu
9. Start Opera
I see nick65go got in here ahead of me but I'll post this anyway.
-
@vinceASPECT
I have just deleted, then loaded again opera10 with appbrowser, and created a fresh flash10;
You are right! Opera10 does not play with the new flash (it is a flash incompatibility, if think i hit it in the past, sorry)
but opera-next (ver 12) will play, as i have now both opened simultaneous on youtube;
-
hello
nick
Do i need to follow all those instructions...?
You see, my laptop does not allow bootcodes. So your advice is not easily possible for me.
(only some keys of the keyboard work....not all keys)
i don't want to complain, but why is nicks advice not in the Opera info file (apps store?)
(if it works)
i can only try his advice imminently by using my dekstop computer after 1.00 am here.
(if nicks advice works, i can then apply his advice to my laptop tcl (hard drive install of tcl)
thanks...
Vince.
-
Opera10 does find the flash plugin and has it listed in it's plugin options, but loads video for a second and then goes to a white screen. However, flash works fine with opera-next as well as a downloaded opera 11.50.
Sounds to me like opera10 is not playing well with the newer flash versions (the one I tested was just downloaded now). My recommendation would be to update to a newer opera.
Oh, just saw Nick's post, but thought I would chime in. We need an opera11 extension, if not done shortly I will put one up.
-
@vinceASPECT
DO NOT TRY anymore, opera10 does not work, for me shows a blank square instead the youtube movie
opera12 indeed run the movie in the same square; both opera10 and opera12 are running simultaneous
-
hello,
i am very sorry forum people. I have been impatient with this thread.
The reason for my impatience is because this is not the first time i have
tried Opera and Flash.
i tried all of this Opera/Flash stuff a month ago and it failed. So i am
not sure how recently YOU forum people have realized about the dysfunctionality
of Opera and Flash, but i myself have never got Opera working with Flash.
To add to this silly situation, i never even realized that "opera next" was actually
a version of Opera browser (version 12) therefor i never tried it out.
anyway, thanks and i will try "Opera Next" with the getFlash extension.
thanks
V.
-
Hello
"Opera next" extension is working correctly with "getFlash" extension. As per usual
download and install methods of TinyCore Linux.
thanks
V.
-
Hi vinceASPECT
Sometimes these things can cause frustration. My version of flash was installed in January. If I'm not
mistaken, we are not allowed to make flash available for direct download, so the script fetches the
latest version which can change from time to time. In case anyone is interested in getting flash to
run with Opera10, the version of flash you need to track down is 10.1.102.65
-
ye...
The Opera next seems fine. It is working correct here.
Vince.
-
I am uploading an opera-11.tcz which is the latest stable 11.50. It should work seamlessly with flash also.
-
Hello
Ahh, that will be very nice. Opera 11.50.
It is always nice to have a stable latest version of something.
yes.
^_^
V.
-
Hello
The Opera 11 extension is very nice.
Just been trying it out and it works fine. It works with Flash also.
It seems snappy. It's greatly appreciated extension.
I like Opera browser, been using it many years and it's often
the browser i go back to when the cookie crumbles.
thanks very much indeed for the new extension (Opera 11)
V.
-
Great, glad to hear it is working well.
I also uploaded a build script to src/opera-11 that would be easy to use on other opera versions by only changing a simple variable or two, easing updates by making it a "one click" process..