Tiny Core Linux

Tiny Core Base => TCB Bugs => Topic started by: Kingdomcome on August 14, 2009, 01:45:34 AM

Title: small cosmetic issue
Post by: Kingdomcome on August 14, 2009, 01:45:34 AM

In the Exit gui, the highlight box (dotted line surrounding the word) for "Backup" is too small.

Title: Re: small cosmetic issue
Post by: thane on October 14, 2009, 04:25:19 AM

[Different issue]

In TCL 2.4, the right-click menu on the flwm desktop has entries for "Refresh Menu" and "Refresh_Menu".

Title: Re: small cosmetic issue
Post by: gerald_clark on October 14, 2009, 08:57:54 AM

Quote from: thane on October 14, 2009, 04:25:19 AM

[Different issue]

In TCL 2.4, the right-click menu on the flwm desktop has entries for "Refresh Menu" and "Refresh_Menu".

This is caused by a leftover .wmx directory from a previous version.
Either remove the "Refresh Menu", or the whole directory. Then backup and reboot.

Title: Re: small cosmetic issue
Post by: roberts on October 14, 2009, 09:08:50 AM

Yes, this was the original post during rc:
http://forum.tinycorelinux.net/index.php?topic=3213.msg16824#msg16824

I recommend adding  home/tc/.wmx  to /opt/.xfiletool.lst unless you have a specific reason not too.

Title: Re: small cosmetic issue
Post by: jls on October 14, 2009, 09:21:34 AM

Quote from: roberts on October 14, 2009, 09:08:50 AM

.....I recommend adding  home/tc/.wmx  to /opt/.xfiletool.lst unless you have a specific reason not too.

to robert: Why don't u put this entry in the default /opt./xfiletool.lst ?

Title: Re: small cosmetic issue
Post by: roberts on October 14, 2009, 09:25:38 AM

In 2.5rc1 it is.

Title: Re: small cosmetic issue
Post by: thane on October 14, 2009, 02:54:09 PM

Sorry, I missed the earlier forum entry.

I'll add home/tc/.wmx to opt/.xfiletool.lst.

edit: Added home/tc/.wmx/Refresh Menu to opt/.xfiletool.lst. Worked, thanks.

Title: Re: small cosmetic issue
Post by: nickispeaki on October 19, 2009, 10:13:45 AM

Quote from: roberts on October 14, 2009, 09:25:38 AM

In 2.5rc1 it is.

where is 2.5rc1? 

Title: Re: small cosmetic issue
Post by: roberts on October 19, 2009, 01:04:11 PM

I am working on it. Not even private preview.
Some complain that development goes too fast for others not fast enough,

Title: Re: small cosmetic issue
Post by: tclfan on October 19, 2009, 01:38:00 PM

Whoever complains one way or the other, please consider the following:
In my comparison of similar Run-All-In-RAM distros, such as Slitaz, Austrumi and Kolibri, TinyCore has fast enough development cycle, but not too fast, so release versions are well de-bugged, thanks to quite active community.
The other distros have too slow or 'way too slow' development cycle. This may not be strategy problem, but rather lack of developers for those...

Title: Re: small cosmetic issue
Post by: roberts on October 19, 2009, 02:31:42 PM

I believe in the GNU mantra of "Release Early, Release Often".
I will not let complains deter my decisions. However, it has only been 9 days!
I am close to a private preview.