Tiny Core Linux

Tiny Core Extensions => TCE Talk => Extension requests => Topic started by: vinceASPECT on September 25, 2020, 11:03:55 PM

Title: "non DAW"
Post by: vinceASPECT on September 25, 2020, 11:03:55 PM

Hello forum,

Would anybody be interested in making a extension of "non DAW" a Digital Audio Workstation.

Thanks

V

It runs on almost No hardware.  "Raspberry Pi zero" would be no problem.

https://non.tuxfamily.org/

There are full suites of free ARM VST compiled plug ins for it.

https://calf-studio-gear.org/  (there are many other ARM plug in suites also)

Title: Re: "non DAW"
Post by: Juanito on September 26, 2020, 04:07:08 AM

Can you clarify which architecture you are requesting this for?

Title: Re: "non DAW"
Post by: vinceASPECT on September 26, 2020, 07:33:35 AM

Yes, it would be a compile for ARM pi-core mostly.

But it would be very good on both x32 and x64  (x86)

That "Non Daw" daw allows VST plugins and full ecosystems to run even
on a pi-zero. Things like VST soft synths as listed below. (arm compiled)

i found some more important powerful tools below for Raspberry Pi DAW work.
(it would be amazing if the tools below could also be compiled for tinycore ARM pi-core
and x86)

The links below are running the tools under the standard Raspbian OS on pi.

https://autostatic.com/2013/07/26/carla-on-the-raspberry-pi/#comment-2953  (ARM plug ins)
https://lsp-plug.in/?page=manuals  (free ARM plug ins for Daws)



There are already several very high level free DAWS for the Raspberry pi.

0) "Non Daw" Daw on ARM for pi ( pi zero board)
      supports VST's and ecosystems (LV2, DSSI, LADSPA)
1) "Waveform Free" Daw for pi (by tracktion) on ARM  (pi 3 or 4 board)
2) "Ardour for pi" Daw  (pi 3 or 4)
3) "Reaper for pi" Daw on ARM    (pi 3 or 4)

other thread
https://wiki.linuxaudio.org/wiki/raspberrypi

Title: Re: "non DAW"
Post by: mocore on September 26, 2020, 08:25:45 AM

+1
 8)

& ..
  thanks vinceASPECT for the arm vst links / research !

Title: Re: "non DAW"
Post by: Rich on September 26, 2020, 08:41:06 AM

Hi vinceASPECT
Juanito ask you a simple question:

Quote from: Juanito on September 26, 2020, 04:07:08 AM

Can you clarify which architecture you are requesting this for?

In less than 2 words, name the 1 architecture you are requesting this for.

Title: Re: "non DAW"
Post by: vinceASPECT on September 26, 2020, 01:51:04 PM

Armv6 (pi zero)

It does not matter if you do not want to compile it.  I have been looking
at distro's that already have it packaged.  Multimedia distros' on Deb Arm.

I just figured TCL may want very powerful software for say pi zero's on Arm.


thx

V

Title: Re: "non DAW"
Post by: Juanito on September 28, 2020, 11:21:11 AM

posted - not tested

Title: Re: "non DAW"
Post by: vinceASPECT on September 28, 2020, 02:35:04 PM

Juanito,

Lord, that is fast for such a task.

i suppose it is in the pi-core repo.

Like i say, it does not matter if you don't compile it on all platforms, i just figured it may
be the type of software that's powerful and desirable for TCL.... (with very low hardware requirements)

It comprises four elements. 

1) non-timeline  (formerly know as "non-daw")   NT
2) non-mixer                                                   NM
3) non-sequencer                                             NS
4) non-session-manager                                   NSM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3oo-3CLrIE4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-mgQpn32lE&t=156s

In the vids above, they used NSM and NM together with other linux tools
such as "Carla" plug in's host........to form a collaborative "Digital Audio Workstation" environment.

While i appreciate that LMMS does support VST and other ecosystems...... it does not have
the very low hardware requirements of the NM suite (on ARMv6)

many thx indeed.

V

Title: Re: "non DAW"
Post by: Devil999 on September 29, 2020, 04:25:02 AM

Quote

Non DAW

I second this.

Title: Re: "non DAW"
Post by: Juanito on September 29, 2020, 04:53:10 AM

It’s already posted in the piCore repos.

Title: Re: "non DAW"
Post by: vinceASPECT on October 19, 2020, 03:57:11 PM

Hello,

i don't know if "non sequencer" was missing from the x86 group of compilations?

1) non timeline
2) non session manager
3) non mixer
4) "non sequencer"

thx V

http://non.tuxfamily.org/sequencer/doc/MANUAL.html

Vin

Title: Re: "non DAW"
Post by: Juanito on October 20, 2020, 06:47:09 AM

As per: http://tinycorelinux.net/11.x/armv6/tcz/non-daw.tcz.list

/usr/local/bin/non-sequencer

Title: Re: "non DAW"
Post by: vinceASPECT on October 20, 2020, 07:36:11 AM

ok thx juanto......x86 is what i first tried recently