Tiny Core Linux

Tiny Core Extensions => TCE Talk => Topic started by: Juanito on January 15, 2020, 01:52:52 AM

Title: Extensions from 10.x repo verified ok with tc-11
Post by: Juanito on January 15, 2020, 01:52:52 AM
As the subject suggests..
Title: Re: Extensions from 10.x repo verified ok with tc-11
Post by: GNUser on January 15, 2020, 09:22:29 AM
I tested these extensions from Pure64 10.1 and they are all working in 11-beta:

dialog.tcz
dzen2.tcz
feh.tcz
fox-dev.tcz
fox.tcz
gc.tcz
giblib.tcz
gtk2.tcz
guile.tcz
haveged.tcz
iridium-browser.tcz
jpegexiforient.tcz
libatomic_ops.tcz
libcups2.tcz
libexif.tcz
libjbig2dec.tcz
mktrayicon.tcz
mupdf.tcz
openjpeg.tcz
p7zip.tcz
parcellite.tcz
rsync.tcz
rxvt.tcz
scrot.tcz
sshpass.tcz
thunderbird-appimage.tcz
xbindkeys.tcz
xdotool.tcz
xfe.tcz

(These are not working, probably have to be recompiled due to new openssl: lftp.tcz, openvpn.tcz)
Title: Re: Extensions from 10.x repo verified ok with tc-11
Post by: GNUser on January 15, 2020, 12:31:56 PM
More working extentions (gnumeric, gnupg, pinentry-gtk and their supporting libraries):

dconf.tcz
gnumeric.tcz
gnupg.tcz
goffice.tcz
libassuan.tcz
libgcrypt.tcz
libglade.tcz
libgpg-error.tcz
libgsf.tcz
libksba.tcz
libsecret.tcz
npth.tcz
pinentry-gtk2.tcz
Title: Re: Extensions from 10.x repo verified ok with tc-11
Post by: GNUser on January 15, 2020, 03:35:15 PM
filezilla and its supporting extensions work fine:

filezilla.tcz
gst-plugins-base.tcz
gstreamer.tcz
libfilezilla.tcz
libnotify.tcz
libtheora.tcz
notification-daemon.tcz
wxwidgets.tcz
Title: Re: Extensions from 10.x repo verified ok with tc-11
Post by: Juanito on January 16, 2020, 03:40:04 AM
libjbig2dec-dev.tcz is missing?
Title: Re: Extensions from 10.x repo verified ok with tc-11
Post by: GNUser on January 16, 2020, 08:22:30 AM
I just finished submitting it to tcesubmit at gmail dot com. Sorry for the oversight.
Title: Re: Extensions from 10.x repo verified ok with tc-11
Post by: GNUser on January 16, 2020, 01:35:50 PM
Working:
dejavu-fonts-ttf.tcz
libdvdread.tcz
libglade.tcz
libsigc++.tcz
lsdvd.tcz

Not working (due to openssl in dependency tree):
gimp2.tcz
qt-4.x-base.tcz
Title: Re: Extensions from 10.x repo verified ok with tc-11
Post by: jazzbiker on January 16, 2020, 03:33:59 PM
Hi!

For x86 TC11b1 were loaded and checked for the simplest usability (not expected to be tested):

Xfbdev and deps:
Xprogs
Xlibs
fltk-1.3
imlib2-bin
libXfont
freetype
libfontenc
libpng
libXmu
libjpeg-turbo
bzip2-lib
libXext
libXt
libX11
libICE
libSM

flwm
aterm
rxvt
libXft
mupdf
openjpeg
jbig2dec
libpng12
mc
glib2
libffi
libssh2
slang

Title: Re: Extensions from 10.x repo verified ok with tc-11
Post by: Juanito on January 24, 2020, 06:10:23 AM
I tested these extensions from Pure64 10.1 and they are all working in 11-beta:
...

That should be most, if not all, of the extensions mentioned copied over.
Title: Re: Extensions from 10.x repo verified ok with tc-11
Post by: GNUser on January 24, 2020, 01:00:33 PM
Beautiful! Thank you, juanito.

Is there planned support for Qt4 applications in TCL11 and beyond, or plan is to phase out Qt4 in favor of Qt5?

Reason I ask is that I use keepassx.tcz a lot. If plan is to phase out Qt4, I can recompile it (git version) for tc-11.x using Qt5.
Title: Re: Extensions from 10.x repo verified ok with tc-11
Post by: Juanito on January 24, 2020, 01:33:44 PM
Phasing out qt4 would be better as it means the old version of gstreamer can also be phased out.
Title: Re: Extensions from 10.x repo verified ok with tc-11
Post by: GNUser on January 24, 2020, 02:21:56 PM
Thanks, juanito. That makes sense. I'll build keepassx that uses qt5 and will submit it for tc-11.x.
Title: Re: Extensions from 10.x repo verified ok with tc-11
Post by: GNUser on January 24, 2020, 02:51:46 PM
New keepassx extension (for qt5 on tc-11.x) submitted.
Title: Re: Extensions from 10.x repo verified ok with tc-11
Post by: cute curtis on February 05, 2020, 10:34:57 PM
hello I'm still at 10.x, how to change repo to 11.x?
Title: Re: Extensions from 10.x repo verified ok with tc-11
Post by: Juanito on February 06, 2020, 01:15:29 AM
You need to update to tinycore 11.x - note that it is still in beta testing
Title: Re: Extensions from 10.x repo verified ok with tc-11
Post by: neonix on February 12, 2020, 02:54:43 PM
dillo-beta.tcz woks in TC11 (x86) and TC11 (x86_64).

In TC11 (x86_64) I tried to compile some perl scripts but there's lack of some extensions like ""perl_XML-LibXML" and other similar. Is it possible to copy them from TC10 (x86_64).

Code: [Select]
cpan install HTML::Parser

ERROR: Can't create '/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.28.0/HTTP'
mkdir /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.28.0/HTTP: Permission denied at /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.28.0/ExtUtils/Install.pm line 489.

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 at -e line 1.
make: *** [Makefile:805: pure_site_install] Error 13
  OALDERS/HTTP-Message-6.18.tar.gz
  /usr/local/bin/make install  -- NOT OK
Running install for module 'HTTP::Headers'
  OALDERS/HTTP-Message-6.18.tar.gz
  Has already been unwrapped into directory /home/tc/.cpan/build/HTTP-Message-6.18-3
  OALDERS/HTTP-Message-6.18.tar.gz
  Has already been prepared
  OALDERS/HTTP-Message-6.18.tar.gz
  Has already been made
  OALDERS/HTTP-Message-6.18.tar.gz
  Has already been tested successfully
  OALDERS/HTTP-Message-6.18.tar.gz
  Already tried without success
Title: Re: Extensions from 10.x repo verified ok with tc-11
Post by: Juanito on February 13, 2020, 01:45:34 AM
dillo-beta.tcz woks in TC11 (x86) and TC11 (x86_64)
copied

Quote
In TC11 (x86_64) I tried to compile some perl scripts but there's lack of some extensions like ""perl_XML-LibXML" and other similar. Is it possible to copy them from TC10 (x86_64).
those extensions are in the x86 repo?
Title: Re: Extensions from 10.x repo verified ok with tc-11
Post by: ricky on February 14, 2020, 11:56:37 AM
Will  mdadm.tcz and linux-kernel-sources-env.tcz be updated for TC11 (x86_64) ?

Many Thanks for your reply !

Ricky

Title: Re: Extensions from 10.x repo verified ok with tc-11
Post by: osman.tc on February 15, 2020, 02:04:50 AM
w3m.tcz
epdf-view.tcz

are missing too
Title: Re: Extensions from 10.x repo verified ok with tc-11
Post by: Juanito on February 15, 2020, 02:26:36 AM
Please send the maintainers a private message to request an update for tc-11
Title: Re: Extensions from 10.x repo verified ok with tc-11
Post by: Juanito on February 15, 2020, 02:39:45 AM
Will  mdadm.tcz and linux-kernel-sources-env.tcz be updated for TC11 (x86_64)

mdadm is in the tc-11.x x86_64 repo?

Please test linux-kernel-sources-env from tc-10.x in tc-11.x and report back if it works.
Title: Re: Extensions from 10.x repo verified ok with tc-11
Post by: ricky on February 15, 2020, 01:32:05 PM
Hi Juanito,

mdadm.tcz is in the tc-11.x x86_64 repo, but the current date in tinycore apps 11 is "2017/01/11" and the changelog is "first version" by you . It works partially in tc-11, but with a mistake.

linux-kernel-sources-env from tc-10.x doensn' t work in tc-11. cliorx linux-kernel-sources-env.sh can't find the source.

Can you help ?

Ricky
Title: Re: Extensions from 10.x repo verified ok with tc-11
Post by: Juanito on February 16, 2020, 01:59:56 AM
mdadm.tcz is in the tc-11.x x86_64 repo, but the current date in tinycore apps 11 is "2017/01/11" and the changelog is "first version" by you . It works partially in tc-11, but with a mistake.
Please supply details of the "mistake"

Quote
linux-kernel-sources-env from tc-10.x doensn' t work in tc-11. cliorx linux-kernel-sources-env.sh can't find the source.
server side adjusted - does it work now?
Title: Re: Extensions from 10.x repo verified ok with tc-11
Post by: neonix on February 16, 2020, 01:48:39 PM
those extensions are in the x86 repo?
You right. In TC11 (x86_64) there is already perl_xml_parser.tcz, but it has different name in the x86 repo. Now it's OK.
Title: Re: Extensions from 10.x repo verified ok with tc-11
Post by: ricky on February 16, 2020, 05:48:23 PM
Hi Juanito,
thank you for your reply.
I send  you the part of dmesg to describe the problem in mdadm.tcz in tc-11 x86_64 as follows :

Code: [Select]
md: md1 stopped.
md1: detected capacity change from 0 to 85832237056
 md1: p1
md: md0 stopped.
md/raid0:md0: cannot assemble multi-zone RAID0 with default_layout setting
md/raid0: please set raid0.default_layout to 1 or 2
md: pers->run() failed ...
md: md0 stopped.
md: md0 stopped.
md/raid0:md0: cannot assemble multi-zone RAID0 with default_layout setting
md/raid0: please set raid0.default_layout to 1 or 2
md: pers->run() failed ...
md: md0 stopped.

So md1 works, but md0 doesn't.
That problem doesn't occur in tc-10. Ma be a kernel problem ?

cliorx linux-kernel-sources-env.sh now find the source, but run 1 and  half hour to finish. So I think that isn't normal in comparison to TC-10. Maybe we ask coreplayer2 to rebuild ?

Thank you for your help

Ricky

    [EDIT]: Added code tags.  Rich
Title: Re: Extensions from 10.x repo verified ok with tc-11
Post by: Juanito on February 17, 2020, 01:03:19 AM
So md1 works, but md0 doesn't.
That problem doesn't occur in tc-10. Ma be a kernel problem ?

If you search on the error message:
Code: [Select]
md/raid0:md0: cannot assemble multi-zone RAID0 with default_layout setting
md/raid0: please set raid0.default_layout to 1 or 2
..there seem to be a lot of hits explaining how to fix the problem.
Title: Re: Extensions from 10.x repo verified ok with tc-11
Post by: Juanito on February 17, 2020, 01:38:01 AM
cliorx linux-kernel-sources-env.sh now find the source, but run 1 and  half hour to finish. So I think that isn't normal in comparison to TC-10. Maybe we ask coreplayer2 to rebuild ?

To prepare the kernel source to compile a single module, something like this used to work:
Code: [Select]
$ cd linux-4.19.10
$ make mrproper
$ cp /tmp/config-4.19.10-tinycore64 ./.config
$ make oldconfig
$ make prepare
$ make modules_prepare
$ cp /tmp/Module.symvers-4.19.10-tinycore64.gz ./Module.symvers.gz
$ gunzip Module.symvers.gz
$ make SUBDIRS=scripts/mod

..and would end after a few seconds with:
Code: [Select]
Building modules, stage 2.
  MODPOST 0 modules

Now with the 5.4.3 kernel this no longer works and instead all of the kernel modules are built, which takes ages.
Title: Re: Extensions from 10.x repo verified ok with tc-11
Post by: ricky on February 17, 2020, 05:24:07 AM
Hi Juanito,

thank you for your reply.
I will try your propositions.

ricky
Title: Package udisks is missing on TC 11.x x86
Post by: Tiago Araujo da Costa on March 21, 2020, 02:03:19 PM
Good afternoon Tinycore team.

The package udisks is missing on TC 11.x x86.
Title: Re: Extensions from 10.x repo verified ok with tc-11
Post by: Juanito on March 22, 2020, 01:33:37 AM
udisks was not in tc-10.x x86..

The CorePure64 build notes are here if you'd like to give it a go: http://tinycorelinux.net/11.x/x86_64/tcz/src/udisks/
Title: Re: Extensions from 10.x repo verified ok with tc-11
Post by: chattrhand on March 30, 2020, 06:26:12 AM
Hi TinyCore Team,

I'm happy to run tc-11.0 successfully with almost all of the extensions I was using before.

However KeePassX 0.4.3 actually is not in the tce repository, I cannot find it.

As a workaround I copy keepassx.tcz* from a frugal tc-10.1 installation to a tc-11.0 one.

With the Apps Browser I do a Load App Locally and it downloads all of the dependencies required with qt-4.x additional to the qt-5.x.

Now KeePassX works, but VLC (that uses qt-5.x) does no longer. Only one of the two will do it,

Many thanks in advance for your help
Title: Re: Extensions from 10.x repo verified ok with tc-11
Post by: Juanito on March 30, 2020, 07:43:07 AM
There's a keepassx in the x86_64 repo if that's any help..
Title: Re: Extensions from 10.x repo verified ok with tc-11
Post by: quest on April 07, 2020, 11:44:56 AM
libattr.tcz was in the 10.X repo but is not in 11.X  :-\
Title: Re: Extensions from 10.x repo verified ok with tc-11
Post by: Juanito on April 07, 2020, 11:48:28 AM
Did you try attr?