Tiny Core Linux
Tiny Core Base => TCB Talk => Topic started by: nick65go on August 18, 2019, 05:33:59 AM
-
"Building The Default x86_64 Linux Kernel In Just 16 Seconds" article on Phoronix.
https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Linux-16-Seconds-AMD-EPYC-2P (https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Linux-16-Seconds-AMD-EPYC-2P)
"It used to be that building out the Linux kernel could easily take the time needed to enjoy a beverage or have a meal while now with the EPYC 7742 2P it's easy to build the Linux kernel in just 15~16 seconds"
Yes, I undestand that the developers have limited resources, such as time, devices/laptops/PC; And yes, the main time is comsumed on testing/debuging. But the Core is mostly about kernels and tools (busybox, flwm), less about tcz-appls. Also new kernels are bigger, unfortunatly. But so is core from 7-10 MB in past time versus 16 MB today.
The main trend is also UEFI (unfortunatly), so x64 forced on us. But the main advantage could be:- - the never ending cicle of meltdown and/or securities patches,
- - new DRM improvments for AMD GPU; Xorg advanmcements depend on kernel also.
- - new microcode (?) / firmware not back-ported- pacthes for file-systems, wire-guard wifi on horizont, etc
I loved (and I still prefer) x86 linux. But sadly x64 bloat will conquer. I am paying for it already (limited option to avoid x64; old hardware available only on unreliable second-hand deviced).
So, do TC developers have an estimate of new kernel issues? Thanks
-
You can run a 32bit kernel with 64bit uefi.
What do you mean by “estimate of new kernel issues”?
-
I mean, which month of 2019 year (if any), for a new kernel version, like from 4.x up to 5.x
-
There's more to a distribution than the Linux kernel version. Most of the other packages need to be updated as well. That takes more time and testing. Are you willing to help?
-
Correct ! ... Also who can better tell on new Linux kernel version release , other than Linus T ? :)
-
processors with up to 64 cores / 128 threads per socket
reminded of
OpenBSD Disabling SMT / Hyper Threading (https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=OpenBSD-Disabling-SMT)
my guess is the open-bsd dev's are probably indifferent about the new hw ;D