Tiny Core Linux
Tiny Core Extensions => TCE News => TCE 2.x => Topic started by: Jason W on July 10, 2009, 12:08:58 AM
-
Xulrunner, the Gecko runtime:
Title: xulrunner.tce
Description: Mozilla XUL + XPCOM application runner.
Version: 1.9.1
Author: The Mozilla Community
Original-site: www.mozilla.com/firefox/
Copying-policy: MPL
Size: 7MB
Extension_by: Jason W
Comments: This extension is PPI compatible.
Built from Firefox 3.5 source.
Change-log: ----
Current: 2009/07/09 First build version 1.9.1
Title: xulrunner.tcz
Description: Mozilla XUL + XPCOM application runner.
Version: 1.9.1
Author: The Mozilla Community
Original-site: www.mozilla.com/firefox/
Copying-policy: MPL
Size: 7MB
Extension_by: Jason W
Comments: Built from Firefox 3.5 source.
Change-log: ----
Current: 2009/07/09 First build version 1.9.1
-
What's the difference between this and Shiretoko. Are there other "firefox 3.5" versions as well that I may have missed!
-
Xulrunner is not a browser, it is a library and toolkit used to build browsers and applications like epiphany and other apps. It is provided for those who would like to build apps against it. More info:
https://developer.mozilla.org/En/XULRunner
-
Xulrunner is not a browser, it is a library and toolkit used to build browsers and applications like epiphany and other apps. It is provided for those who would like to build apps against it. More info:
https://developer.mozilla.org/En/XULRunner
Thanks for that... on another note then - what is the difference between Shiretoko and firefox 3.5. Both exist as separate extensions.
-
Differences are mentioned here:
http://forum.tinycorelinux.net/index.php?topic=2271.msg12181#msg12181
Shiretoko is better suited to RAM based /home use with some of it's changes from the official Firefox.
-
I am no seeing this extension in appbrowser or through the web interface. Has this been removed? If so, why?
-
I thought I had posted it's removal, evidently didn't. But if someone is wanting to use a shared xul to build epiphany or another browser, xulrunner can be built then. I didn't see the point in maintaining it until there is a use for it. Most any Mozilla type of browser is going to be self contained anyway.
-
Ah. No need to rebuild or repost. I may need XPCOM for a project which I believe is part of xulrunner, but Im not sure yet. If I do need it, I will build an XPCOM only extensions. Thanks :)