Tiny Core Linux
Tiny Core Extensions => TCE Q&A Forum => Topic started by: jrm7262 on May 16, 2014, 03:42:45 AM
-
Hello All,
Have been trying to compie Fluff and am stuck with this error:
/usr/bin/ld: fluff.o: undefined reference to symbol '_Znwj@@GLIBCXX_3.4'
//usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6: error adding symbols: DSO missing from command line
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [all] Error 1
There's no reference to symbol '_Znwj@@GLIBCXX_3.4' in fluff.o that I can find
and the second line is going over my head at the moment.
Any guidance?
Kindest regards
James
j8-7
-
Did you load the compiletc extension and how are you trying to compile fluff?
-
Hi Juanito
Thank you for the reply, apologies for not giving more information.
I'm trying to compile Fluff in Debian. I believe I have all the necessary build tools installed.
I downloaded the fluff source tarball and expanded it in its own folder.
I then ran Sudo Make (as make alone kept giving me write permission errors) and after solving a couple of initial problems with the tool-chain and flag errors, have arrived at the error in my original post.
I know this isn't compiling within TinyCore, but was hoping someone would be able to give me some insight into the error.
(I like using fluff in TinyCore, it's so light and fast and provides all I want in a file manager, I wanted to see if I could use it in my other distros)
I've managed to get Mnttool and the Editor working (they're the other two utilities in TinyCore I think are excellent) and I'm just left with my Fluff conundrum.
Kindest regards
James
-
You may be trying to compile a version of fluff without the linking fixed - if you search for fluff compile error, you see it at one point tried to link with a C compiler.
-
Thank you curaga, that worked.
Interestingly I did a search for 'fluff compile error' in the forum and got nothing.
But when I did the search in google it showed the posting in the forum, um???
Kindest regards
James
j8-7
-
The various forum/CMS search engines tend to be worse than Google, yes.