WelcomeWelcome | FAQFAQ | DownloadsDownloads | WikiWiki

Author Topic: microcore_v3.5rc1  (Read 12036 times)

Offline roberts

  • Retired Admins
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7361
  • Founder Emeritus
microcore_v3.5rc1
« on: January 29, 2011, 03:01:04 PM »
The First Release Candidate of Micro Core v3.5 is now posted and ready for testing.
http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/linux/distributions/tinycorelinux/3.x/release_candidates/microcore

microcore_3.5rc1.iso
microcore_3.5rc1.iso.md5.txt

Change log for Micro Core v3.5:

* Clean up of tce-audit 'delete' spurious messages.
* New tce-remove support for tce-audit/appsaudit.
* Moved thinkpad_acpi.ko from base to extension.
* Updated tc-config crond call and removed duplicate crond script.
* Updated busybox 1.18.1 plus patches.
* Scripts adjusted to remove extra spaces to reduce size.
* fsck replaced with busybox fsck
* zsync upgraded to 0.6.2.
* Changed all core components from .gz to tcz.
  (Note need to add them to onboot.lst, order is important.)
10+ Years Contributing to Linux Open Source Projects.

Offline gerald_clark

  • TinyCore Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4254
Re: microcore_v3.5rc1
« Reply #1 on: January 29, 2011, 06:54:35 PM »
Looks good.
I am already using gzs converted to tczs in my optional directory.

I was wondering if the rc core components could have rc in their names.
Ex: Xprogs-rc.tcz
I use symlinks to share optional between release and release-candidate tce directories.


Offline tinypoodle

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3857
Re: microcore_v3.5rc1
« Reply #2 on: January 30, 2011, 01:12:20 AM »
Particularly using "rc" as suffix of files unrelated to 'run commands' might potentially lead to confusion.
Perhaps "-rel" or something else might be less problematic.
"Software gets slower faster than hardware gets faster." Niklaus Wirth - A Plea for Lean Software (1995)

Offline Lee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 645
    • My Core wiki user page
Re: microcore_v3.5rc1
« Reply #3 on: January 30, 2011, 09:54:56 AM »
Quote
Perhaps "-rel" or something else might be less problematic.

Well... "-rel" would seem to lose the "condidate" part.  I like the idea of using some kind of signal, though.  How about something indicating to -which- rc it applies, for the benefit of those of us who don't do cleanup diligently?  Something like  Xprogs-3.5rc1.tcz
32 bit core4.7.7, Xprogs, Xorg-7.6, wbar, jwm  |  - Testing -
PPR, data persistence through filetool.sh          |  32 bit core 8.0 alpha 1
USB Flash drive, one partition, ext2, grub4dos  | Otherwise similar

Offline jur

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 863
    • cycling photo essays
Re: microcore_v3.5rc1
« Reply #4 on: January 31, 2011, 04:02:38 PM »
* Changed all core components from .gz to tcz.
  (Note need to add them to onboot.lst, order is important.)

What should the order be? If this is indeed important, it could perhaps be mentioned in the OP?

Offline roberts

  • Retired Admins
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7361
  • Founder Emeritus
Re: microcore_v3.5rc1
« Reply #5 on: January 31, 2011, 05:24:29 PM »
I only mentioned it because .gzs load before tczs. So to emulate prior setup place new tczs before existing tczs.
10+ Years Contributing to Linux Open Source Projects.

Offline Juanito

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14851
Re: microcore_v3.5rc1
« Reply #6 on: February 03, 2011, 07:06:33 AM »
Perhaps intended, but after using "sudo tce-setup" and starting x and also rebooting with Xprogs, Xlibs, Xvesa, flwm, wbar in onboot.lst in that order, the screen background is black/blank.

Using panel/wallpaper/colour and chosing any colour brings back the screen background and tinycore logo.

[all this with no backup]
« Last Edit: February 03, 2011, 07:08:18 AM by Juanito »

Offline roberts

  • Retired Admins
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7361
  • Founder Emeritus
Re: microcore_v3.5rc1
« Reply #7 on: February 03, 2011, 09:49:45 PM »
10+ Years Contributing to Linux Open Source Projects.

Offline Juanito

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14851
Re: microcore_v3.5rc1
« Reply #8 on: February 05, 2011, 02:39:35 AM »
fixed  :)