Wouldn't version 6 be more desired at this time, since v7 is still under development (afaik)?
Yes, it would. However the version 6 build failed while the version 7 built without problems. My plan is to submit version 7 soon (within a day or two) and then try to get the version 6 to build without failure. If I get version 6 to build I plan to submit that too. Users would then be able to either pick openjdk-6 or openjdk-7.
Currently I have the following extensions for openjdk-7
openjdk-7-jdk.tcz 13 Mbyte
openjdk-7-jre.tcz 34 Mbyte
openjdk-7-jdk-misc.tcz 24 MByte
openjdk-7-jre-server.tcz 4 Mbyte
openjdk-7-jre-server is only needed if the jvm is to run in server mode.
openjdk-7-jdk-misc contains man pages, samples and demos (stuff not required at run-time)
openjdk-7-jdk depends on openjdk-7-jre
/Lars