WelcomeWelcome | FAQFAQ | DownloadsDownloads | WikiWiki

Author Topic: [Solved]Has anyone tried to run TCL as Xen host?  (Read 4060 times)

Offline Xianwen Chen

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 142
[Solved]Has anyone tried to run TCL as Xen host?
« on: January 16, 2010, 10:58:28 AM »
Hi! Has anyone tried to run TCL as Xen host?
« Last Edit: January 17, 2010, 01:57:31 PM by Wen »

Offline gerald_clark

  • TinyCore Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4254
Re: Has anyone tried to run TCL as Xen host?
« Reply #1 on: January 16, 2010, 01:28:41 PM »
Xen requires a custom kernel for both the Dom0 and DomU.

Offline Xianwen Chen

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 142
Re: Has anyone tried to run TCL as Xen host?
« Reply #2 on: January 16, 2010, 05:37:43 PM »
Xen requires a custom kernel for both the Dom0 and DomU.

I don't think it will be a custom kernel. Xen is now part of the kernel tree, isn't it?

Offline ^thehatsrule^

  • Retired Admins
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1726
Re: Has anyone tried to run TCL as Xen host?
« Reply #3 on: January 17, 2010, 12:26:01 AM »
That doesn't mean that every kernel build has it enabled

Offline Xianwen Chen

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 142
Re: Has anyone tried to run TCL as Xen host?
« Reply #4 on: January 17, 2010, 06:01:02 AM »
Will TCL has it enabled in the future?

Offline curaga

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11041
Re: Has anyone tried to run TCL as Xen host?
« Reply #5 on: January 17, 2010, 06:29:26 AM »
AFAIK Xen is not fully in the kernel yet, requiring additional patches for full functionality.

On the other hand, TC as a KVM host works great right now.
The only barriers that can stop you are the ones you create yourself.

Offline Xianwen Chen

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 142
Re: Has anyone tried to run TCL as Xen host?
« Reply #6 on: January 17, 2010, 01:57:15 PM »
AFAIK Xen is not fully in the kernel yet, requiring additional patches for full functionality.

On the other hand, TC as a KVM host works great right now.
I see your point. And I agree. Thanks!