Tiny Core Extensions > TCE Talk

Creating TCL extention in simple steps !

<< < (4/5) > >>

Pats:
bmarkus, curaga, Aslan !
Thanks for the guidance ! Going thru diff links given here - lot of reading , I think !
Some more Qs:
Which debuger is easy to use for a newbee - pdb ?

second, I want to use gnumeric object (open gnumeric sheet, put some rows/columns and @sum formula at the end of the rows ) in my sample app, can we do it (it can be in C, C++ or Python/TC anything ) like in Win ? If yes, how ? Some links pl.

Thanks !
~ Pats

Pats:
My sincere thanks to all the guys here, who responded to my this message abt programming front-end in Linux

At last, after more than 3 months of practicing with FLTK and Gnome/GTK, I have developed my 1st full-fledged commercial app - using C++/FLTK combo.
But before distributing this Linux Commercial app. , I would like to know abt any Licencing policies. Should I have to take any care before selling my app to my customers - either from TCLinux, FLTK, or GCC/C++ developers ?

I will install TC2.5 with my app pre-loaded in /home/tc directory with a second ext2 Linux partition.
Pl guide.
Thnks !
Note: I am using built-in libs/*.h files of fltk in TC2.5

~ Pats

curaga:
You need to say you use FLTK in your app documentation, about box or similar. http://fltk.org/COPYING.php

For your app there's nothing else, unless you use other libraries / code.


For distributing TC, you need to also provide sources (2.x/release/src); either include them with the app, or host them somewhere and include a link. Pointing to upstream sources (ie. us) is not allowed in the GPL.

Pats:
Um...! Extremely sorry abt my ignorance in Linux, but I must clarify my situation.
Since, I will be statically compiling my C++ code with GCC3.2 headers and libs(compiletc.tcz), will it need any extra mention abt GCC3.2 copyright ?
Secondly, the intended customers of mine, know nothing abt LinuxOS or TCL2.5, but do you think, still should I distribute the TC sources along with TC2.5 ?
And lastly, since I am using built-in FLTK libs from TC2.5, will it require mentioning abt FLTK in my About window ?
( Off-cource I do not mind mentioning copy-right GPL licences of the respective owners of the products ! :) )

I have converted my commercial app into TC extention, and I will be distributing only the binaries.
This app is related to Medical Practitioners.

Thnks !

~Pats

curaga:

--- Quote from: Pats on August 15, 2010, 07:03:04 AM ---Um...! Extremely sorry abt my ignorance in Linux, but I must clarify my situation.
Since, I will be statically compiling my C++ code with GCC3.2 headers and libs(compiletc.tcz), will it need any extra mention abt GCC3.2 copyright ?
--- End quote ---

Compiling everything statically? It wouldn't make sense to link basic libs like libc or libstdc++ statically.
Any GCC runtime libs are however governed by the runtime exception, which means you can just ignore them even if statically linked.


--- Quote ---Secondly, the intended customers of mine, know nothing abt LinuxOS or TCL2.5, but do you think, still should I distribute the TC sources along with TC2.5 ?
--- End quote ---

You can also host them online somewhere. What matters is that if they want to, they can have the TC sources.


--- Quote ---And lastly, since I am using built-in FLTK libs from TC2.5, will it require mentioning abt FLTK in my About window ?
--- End quote ---

Yes, or docs. It's what the FLTK people themselves ask.


--- Quote ---( Off-cource I do not mind mentioning copy-right GPL licences of the respective owners of the products ! :) )

I have converted my commercial app into TC extention, and I will be distributing only the binaries.
This app is related to Medical Practitioners.

Thnks !

~Pats


--- End quote ---

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version