WelcomeWelcome | FAQFAQ | DownloadsDownloads | WikiWiki
« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: mount doesn't accept -L or -U options anymore?  (Read 3060 times)

Offline frimical

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 75
mount doesn't accept -L or -U options anymore?
« on: December 03, 2009, 05:17:11 PM »
any  reason?
Logged

Offline ^thehatsrule^

  • Retired Admins
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1726
Re: mount doesn't accept -L or -U options anymore?
« Reply #1 on: December 03, 2009, 05:22:05 PM »
Logged

Offline frimical

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 75
Re: mount doesn't accept -L or -U options anymore?
« Reply #2 on: December 03, 2009, 05:27:48 PM »
I thought that older verssions used busybox mount too...
ok, thanks
Logged

Offline roberts

  • Retired Admins
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7361
  • Founder Emeritus
Re: mount doesn't accept -L or -U options anymore?
« Reply #3 on: December 03, 2009, 06:38:28 PM »
mount was gnu, umount was busybox, now both are busybox.

Both mount and umount can be used with labels or uuid via blkid e.g.,

mount `blkid -U 268E-89CB`  and  umount `blkid -U 268E-89CB`

mount `blkid -L tinycore` and  umount `blkid -L tinycore`
Logged
10+ Years Contributing to Linux Open Source Projects.

Offline frimical

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 75
Re: mount doesn't accept -L or -U options anymore?
« Reply #4 on: December 04, 2009, 08:36:38 AM »
I  guessed that  we needed now to use blkid.
never mind,now  it's  clearer;   

thank  you
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »