xulrunner

[Jason W]

Xulrunner, the Gecko runtime:

Code: [Select]

Title:          xulrunner.tce
Description:    Mozilla XUL + XPCOM application runner.
Version:        1.9.1
Author:         The Mozilla Community
Original-site:  www.mozilla.com/firefox/
Copying-policy: MPL
Size: 7MB
Extension_by:   Jason W
Comments:       This extension is PPI compatible.
Built from Firefox 3.5 source.
Change-log:     ----
Current:        2009/07/09 First build version 1.9.1



Code: [Select]

Title:          xulrunner.tcz
Description:    Mozilla XUL + XPCOM application runner.
Version:        1.9.1
Author:         The Mozilla Community
Original-site:  www.mozilla.com/firefox/
Copying-policy: MPL
Size: 7MB
Extension_by:   Jason W
Comments:       Built from Firefox 3.5 source.
Change-log:     ----
Current:        2009/07/09 First build version 1.9.1



[kerpob]

What's the difference between this and Shiretoko. Are there other "firefox 3.5" versions as well that I may have missed!

[Jason W]

Xulrunner is not a browser, it is a library and toolkit used to build browsers and applications like epiphany and other apps.  It is provided for those who would like to build apps against it.  More info:

https://developer.mozilla.org/En/XULRunner

[kerpob]

Xulrunner is not a browser, it is a library and toolkit used to build browsers and applications like epiphany and other apps.  It is provided for those who would like to build apps against it.  More info:

https://developer.mozilla.org/En/XULRunner

Thanks for that... on another note then - what is the difference between Shiretoko and firefox 3.5. Both exist as separate extensions.

[Jason W]

Differences are mentioned here:

http://forum.tinycorelinux.net/index.php?topic=2271.msg12181#msg12181

Shiretoko is better suited to RAM based /home use with some of it's changes from the official Firefox.

[Kingdomcome]

I am no seeing this extension in appbrowser or through the web interface.  Has this been removed?  If so, why?

[Jason W]

I thought I had posted it's removal, evidently didn't.  But if someone is wanting to use a shared xul to build epiphany or another browser, xulrunner can be built then.  I didn't see the point in maintaining it until there is a use for it.  Most any Mozilla type of browser is going to be self contained anyway. 

[Kingdomcome]

Ah.  No need to rebuild or repost.  I may need XPCOM for a project which I believe is part of xulrunner, but Im not sure yet.  If I do need it, I will build an XPCOM only extensions.  Thanks