Tiny Core Base > TCB Q&A Forum

Linux fork in the road

<< < (2/2)

cyberdaddy:
Though I may not be a long time contributor of this project, I genuinely would recommend that it would be best to keep "Rust" at a distance and allow people to support it.

The incremental benefits "Rust" offers is not worth the whole overhaul of trying to rewrite programs written in "C" and "C++" which would be better if they were contained and clamped respectively.

There's a lot of code waste that will occur from "Rust" and itll be a grand waste of time much like how seemingly the web developers took a wrong (least productive) route by making "JavaScript" the language of the "World Wide Web".

cyberdaddy:

--- Quote from: gadget42 on June 10, 2025, 11:41:49 AM ---https://stackoverflow.com/questions/72694268/can-you-make-an-os-only-using-assembly-language

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BareMetal

https://github.com/ReturnInfinity/BareMetal-OS

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KolibriOS

https://www.kolibrios.org/en/index.htm

--- End quote ---

The "BareMetal OS" project looks like a decent effort at making an exokernel, will be a challenge to do it well. Nonetheless, I shall visit this project more in depth when I can.

The "Kolibrios" project should rename itself to "Pane", perhaps it could replace "Windows" lol because it does look a lot like XP.

nick65go:
IF all changes / bloat (rust) are made mostly in the name of "security" then we are on a wrong path, as we complacently accept "insecurity"/ back-doors default build in hardware (CPU / GPU) and firmware (closed sources) in the name of bullshit intellectual "property".

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page