WelcomeWelcome | FAQFAQ | DownloadsDownloads | WikiWiki

Author Topic: missing dep for 88x2bu.tcz in TCL15 x86_64 repo  (Read 231 times)

Offline GNUser

  • Wiki Author
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1494
missing dep for 88x2bu.tcz in TCL15 x86_64 repo
« on: October 18, 2024, 08:58:16 AM »
I'm the maintainer for this extension. Turns out it needs a dep file, please. The extension's sole dependency is wireless-KERNEL.tcz

Offline Rich

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11573
Re: missing dep for 88x2bu.tcz in TCL15 x86_64 repo
« Reply #1 on: October 18, 2024, 09:09:09 AM »
Hi GNUser
Repo has been updated.

Offline GNUser

  • Wiki Author
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1494
Re: missing dep for 88x2bu.tcz in TCL15 x86_64 repo
« Reply #2 on: October 18, 2024, 09:12:30 AM »
Thank you :)

Offline GNUser

  • Wiki Author
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1494
Re: missing dep for 88x2bu.tcz in TCL15 x86_64 repo
« Reply #3 on: October 18, 2024, 10:10:29 AM »
Hi Rich. I noticed one more thing. (You said "if you see something, say something" recently, so here you go  :) )

This extension's .info file states this:
Code: [Select]
                Note: firmware is embedded in the kernel module.
                (i.e., a separate firmware file is not needed.)
This information is out of date. Beginning with kernel version 6.2, separate firmware is needed for most devices that use this driver (the one that I use for testing seems to be an exception). Can you please delete those two lines from the .info file? It has caused confusion to some users.

Offline Rich

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11573
Re: missing dep for 88x2bu.tcz in TCL15 x86_64 repo
« Reply #4 on: October 18, 2024, 11:24:37 AM »
Hi GNUser
... You said "if you see something, say something" recently ...
And I meant it. ;D

Updated .info file posted.

Offline GNUser

  • Wiki Author
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1494
Re: missing dep for 88x2bu.tcz in TCL15 x86_64 repo
« Reply #5 on: October 18, 2024, 11:27:18 AM »
And I meant it. ;D
Apparently :)
Thanks again.