Tiny Core Base > Corepure64

xpopple-xpdf in tc12_x64 asked for new libc 2.33+ (from TC13)

(1/2) > >>

nick65go:

--- Code: ---tc@box:/tmp/tcloop/xpopple-xpdf/usr/local/bin$ ldd ./xpdf | grep not
./xpdf: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.34' not found (required by ./xpdf)
./xpdf: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.33' not found (required by ./xpdf)
./xpdf: /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.29' not found (required by ./xpdf)

--- End code ---
was compiled on TC13_x64, but is not suitable for TC12_x64, because the new libc in tc13  :P

Juanito:
xpopple-xpdf removed from 12.x repo

CNK:
I actually submitted two Xpdf extensions, the xpopple-xpdf one was indeed for TC 13 only. The other one was xpdf-motif, which is the original version (last before switching from Motif to the Qt toolkit) that the xpopple project forked from. That one was compiled for TC 12 (and also tested on TC 13), so maybe that's where the confusion came from (plus the Motif library that they both use was built for TC 12).

I guess the xpdf-motif extension was considered superfluous (it's actually the one I'm using because there are slightly smaller deps, but xpopple will have up-to-date PDF rendering), or maybe it's still pending. Either way it can be safely added to the TC 12 repo if desired.

By the way, the Nedit extension which is also pending was also for TC 13 only.

Juanito:
Neither xpdf-motif nor nedit extensions have been received..

CNK:

--- Quote from: Juanito on February 28, 2022, 05:17:56 AM ---Neither xpdf-motif nor nedit extensions have been received..

--- End quote ---

Hmm, that's strange. Though it did worry me sending so many emails with large attachments to the same address in one batch, so maybe they got blocked somewhere.

Both extensions re-sent. If they still don't get through then let me know, there's another mail server that I can use.

Nedit is quite a nice lightweight text editor, also using the Motif toolkit.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page