WelcomeWelcome | FAQFAQ | DownloadsDownloads | WikiWiki

Author Topic: split OpenOffice extension  (Read 9002 times)

Offline alu

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 429
split OpenOffice extension
« on: July 20, 2009, 05:27:38 PM »
is it possible to split the openoffice extension in order to have a separate writer, a separate xcalc, and so on?; i come up to this idea remembering dsl which, as i believe, did offer this opportunity in order to save ram usage.

Offline Juanito

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14817
Re: split OpenOffice extension
« Reply #1 on: July 20, 2009, 05:59:56 PM »
Does it make a big difference if you use the tczl version?

Offline alu

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 429
Re: split OpenOffice extension
« Reply #2 on: July 20, 2009, 06:26:37 PM »
with the oo2.tclz extension, i get 115.6 MB loaded, while i am using writer only; if i had to load writer only, i would come up with around 65 MB, i think; it would make a big difference for me

Offline junan

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 88
Re: split OpenOffice extension
« Reply #3 on: July 21, 2009, 02:28:27 AM »
why not try abiword ?
and gnumeric for spreadsheet.
fun and fearless ...

Offline alu

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 429
Re: split OpenOffice extension
« Reply #4 on: July 21, 2009, 08:40:51 AM »
i'd like to use it (abiword), but even if i am not an experimented user of abiword, it has not some functionalities that i am used to use with openoffice; f.ex. quotation marks and apostrophes are not supported in several languages, and i am writing in almost 4 languages for which i need 4 different quotation marks' and apostrophes' styles without using the insert menu function or the copy/paste one at each time. Otherwise, my experience with abiword was not so good (maybe it's me) as f.ex. when i have to import a doc document with graphics and so on; it takes a long time to load, and it forces me to reformate the document in most of the cases (footnotes messed up each time, and to reformate footnotes with abiword is really a pain). Last but not least: it will be a detail for you folks, but the (smooth or non-smooth) scrolling functionality in abiword is really something that sucks. That's why i got back to openoffice writer which deserve my purposes without too much time lost. So spliting the oo2.tczl extension would enable me to reduce memory storage without any loss of productivity.

Offline bmarkus

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7183
    • My Community Forum
Re: split OpenOffice extension
« Reply #5 on: July 21, 2009, 08:44:10 AM »
BTW OO 2.3 is rather old now, current version is 3.1.0
Béla
Ham Radio callsign: HA5DI

"Amateur Radio: The First Technology-Based Social Network."

Offline alu

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 429
Re: split OpenOffice extension
« Reply #6 on: July 21, 2009, 12:49:53 PM »
yes, but i think that oo3.1 would be much difficult to split (a guess from me there), and frankly, oo2.3 works very well; it has in my view only one big issue which is it can not read docx files; about that last point, i would agree with you, and would also say that we need a oo3.1 extension; but that's already too much requests within one post. 

Offline bmarkus

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7183
    • My Community Forum
Re: split OpenOffice extension
« Reply #7 on: July 21, 2009, 02:25:48 PM »
There are some more changes in 3.x but not so significant for the every day use.

For .docx files you can use a 3rd party tool, odf-converter-integrator for example:

http://katana.oooninja.com/w/odf-converter-integrator

Béla
Ham Radio callsign: HA5DI

"Amateur Radio: The First Technology-Based Social Network."

Offline alu

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 429
Re: split OpenOffice extension
« Reply #8 on: July 22, 2009, 04:56:42 PM »
mmmhh... do i have to compile it, or is it a shorter way to get that odf-converter-integrator working; thanks anyway Bella for the tip, even if i remain sceptical with 'translations' apps. you know, if tex would offer better ways to deal with doc and other common sense formats, i would have been stuck at that. simplicity, no brain washing, but your know the story for sure

Offline bmarkus

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7183
    • My Community Forum
Re: split OpenOffice extension
« Reply #9 on: July 23, 2009, 08:07:29 AM »
I'm not using it, but guess it must be compiled and converted to a tce/tcz extension.
Béla
Ham Radio callsign: HA5DI

"Amateur Radio: The First Technology-Based Social Network."

Offline Juanito

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14817
Re: split OpenOffice extension
« Reply #10 on: July 27, 2009, 01:51:48 AM »
I've started to look at openoffice-3.1 - it seems to start compiling OK (after a couple of hacks), but I had to <ctrl-c> out as 2GB ram is (obviously) not enough.

Once I line up some hd space to compile, I'll try to compile the whole thing and test it works before trying to split the components.

Offline curaga

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11044
Re: split OpenOffice extension
« Reply #11 on: July 27, 2009, 05:20:54 AM »
People around have recommended Go-office as the "better" OO.o fork currently. Maybe starting from it would be better? (go-oo.org)
The only barriers that can stop you are the ones you create yourself.

Offline bmarkus

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7183
    • My Community Forum
Re: split OpenOffice extension
« Reply #12 on: July 27, 2009, 05:26:13 AM »
Looks good at first glance. Lets see it.
Béla
Ham Radio callsign: HA5DI

"Amateur Radio: The First Technology-Based Social Network."

Offline bigpcman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 719
Re: split OpenOffice extension
« Reply #13 on: July 27, 2009, 10:57:20 AM »
I've started to look at openoffice-3.1 - it seems to start compiling OK (after a couple of hacks), but I had to <ctrl-c> out as 2GB ram is (obviously) not enough.

Once I line up some hd space to compile, I'll try to compile the whole thing and test it works before trying to split the components.

I agree go-office looks like a better starting point.
big pc man

Offline Juanito

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14817
Re: split OpenOffice extension
« Reply #14 on: July 27, 2009, 12:53:44 PM »
Hmm...

Code: [Select]
making .dpslo
----------------------------------------------------------
- start unit test on library ../unxlngi6.pro/lib/libbasegfx_tests.so
----------------------------------------------------------
testshl2 -sf /tmp/mkjJKbjj -forward ../unxlngi6.pro/bin/ ../unxlngi6.pro/lib/libbasegfx_tests.so
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'CppUnit::StubException'
dmake:  Error code 134, while making '../unxlngi6.pro/misc/unittest_succeeded'

ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making /mnt/sdb1/usr/src/OOO310_m11/basegfx/test
rmdir /tmp/12036
dmake:  Error code 1, while making 'build_instsetoo_native'
Command exited with non-zero status 255
real    33m 43.52s

google doesn't find an answer to this