Off-Topic > Off-Topic - Tiny Core Lounge
OS's
cast-fish:
sorry to bother anybody ......it's an off topic thing
but
is it generally understood that in the main, win32 or win64 always should (or indeed actually needs) to be installed to a primary partition?
google throws up lots of convoluted 'computing opinions" type answers.....instead of people actually answering just the body of the point
thx
V
andyj:
Windows pretends like they are the only ones that exist and they don't play well with others. My work machine is multiboot, so I have learned from experience that you need to install Windows first into a primary partiion, then Linux later. Linux can see Windows partitions, Windows is blind to anything not MS. I run can run Windows natively or in a VM from Linux using a physical partition. It works, but there have been some recent Windows patches that make this a booting HELL. You will get familiar with the windows bootrec.exe command in the recovery console.
cast-fish:
andj
thanks for your reply and i seem to concur with what you say.....it seems Msoft just have their own rules that nobody else really likes to agree with.
Having said all that.....in all my years i have never actually been aware that win32/64 really needs to go into a primary partition. It was never something i
readily realized or saw mentioned anyplace.
I actually think the reasoning behind it is far more involved and concerns licenses and boot strappers and the MS empire over global hardware.
That said ........google can throw up all types of peoples opinions.
We are not allowed to blog on this TCL forum (i know) but my final question is close to what you also mentioned Andj .
Question:
Once my machine has an empty primary partition
and i install win32 into that partition, i expect that win32's bootloader will then obscure the
existing boot manager that was acting in my second Linux partition
(partition 2 "tinyCORE" Linux--)(logical partition)-- syslinux boot manager.
.......is it therefor true, that Linux will then become invisible on this machine?..... and not be able to be readily booted ?
Thanks
V
andyj:
Yes, which is why you must install windows first, then Linux. Otherwise you will need to boot from some other media and fix the boot loader. It may be technically possible to get the MS boot loader to recognize another OS using some third party BCD editor, but I don't have any experience with that.
cast-fish:
andj
thought so....
thanks for your fast reply
V
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version