Tiny Core Base > Release Candidate Testing

Micro Core & Core Elements

<< < (2/3) > >>

bigpcman:
If the "core elements" are stored on a usb stick instead of in ram will there be a much of a performance impact?
Also, are there substantial "writes" to core elements that will cause usb wear out?

meo:
Hi Robert!

Very nice work with Micro Core (this goes for all who have participated in this project). I only have a small suggestion. Why not change the splash screen from Tiny Core to Micro Core? At least I think it would be a good idea. Keep up the good work in this project!

Have fun,
meo

roberts:

--- Quote from: bigpcman on June 03, 2009, 04:06:32 PM ---If the "core elements" are stored on a usb stick instead of in ram will there be a much of a performance impact?
Also, are there substantial "writes" to core elements that will cause usb wear out?

--- End quote ---

Core elements are programs and libraries. Therefore static. Therefore I would presume not.
As far as speed goes, depends on flash read speed. If you only have usb 1.0 then I would suspect an impact.

roberts:

--- Quote from: meo on June 03, 2009, 07:34:58 PM ---Hi Robert!

Very nice work with Micro Core (this goes for all who have participated in this project). I only have a small suggestion. Why not change the splash screen from Tiny Core to Micro Core? At least I think it would be a good idea. Keep up the good work in this project!

Have fun,
meo

--- End quote ---
I believe you are talking about the framebuffer Tiny Core image that comes from the kernel.
Micro Core and Tiny Core share the same kernel, so only one image.

I now maintain Micro Core and Core Elements only. Tiny Core is auto-generated and as such is just a prebuilt combined image from Micro Core, Core Elements, and the window manager JWM.

roberts:
I have updated core_elements. Check your md5sums.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page