Tiny Core Base > piCore Test Releases
piCore-5.2alpha2
bmarkus:
Hm.... Will check, it is not intended
tinypoodle:
--- Quote from: Paul_123 on February 11, 2014, 11:22:20 AM ---I also had a problem that when I unplugged the ethernet cable, the interface was not automatically taken down.
--- End quote ---
Why would you expect that, and why would you consider it being a problem if not?
Paul_123:
--- Quote from: tinypoodle on February 11, 2014, 05:42:26 PM ---
--- Quote from: Paul_123 on February 11, 2014, 11:22:20 AM ---I also had a problem that when I unplugged the ethernet cable, the interface was not automatically taken down.
--- End quote ---
Why would you expect that, and why would you consider it being a problem if not?
--- End quote ---
In my case I added wifi. After I connected the wifi, I unplugged my ethernet cable.......the system would not route traffic properly until I down'ed the eth0 interface.
I would expect that an interface that starts automatically would stop automatically. I put wifi on almost every tinycore image, I've never seen that problem before. Maybe I rebooted in the middle.....but I've just never noticed it on tinycore.
tinypoodle:
--- Quote from: Paul_123 on February 11, 2014, 06:41:44 PM ---After I connected the wifi, I unplugged my ethernet cable.......the system would not route traffic properly until I down'ed the eth0 interface.
--- End quote ---
I wouldn't expect anything different.
Just deleting the default gateway associated with interface would do as well.
--- Quote ---I would expect that an interface that starts automatically would stop automatically.
--- End quote ---
Nothing starts automatically by plugging the ethernet cable in.
A script would bring up interface at boot and run udhcpc when boot code "nodhcp" is omitted.
Paul_123:
--- Quote from: tinypoodle on February 11, 2014, 07:33:30 PM ---Nothing starts automatically by plugging the ethernet cable in.
A script would bring up interface at boot and run udhcpc when boot code "nodhcp" is omitted.
--- End quote ---
I guess with udev running, I assumed udev managed the hardwire interfaces. * Wrong assumption *
No big deal
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[*] Previous page
Go to full version