Please copy and paste the command from forum to a terminal - verbatim et literatim - and then show the content of filetool.lst.
Dear tinypoodle:
There are NO stupid questions, only answers.
Well, often you seem not to provide accurate/specific answers to what is requested from you by all those trying to support you...
All forward slashes confirmed OK.
Not sure what to make out of this, I think the request (which you even quoted!) was as simple, specific and detailed as possible, you shout "bug" every somesuch, but are not really helping if you don't follow up with further investigation.
You have been pointed to the exact same "How to" more than one year ago, in a thread in where you had similar complaints and requests and claimed similar bugs as in this one, none of which has been proven to be a bug ever since.
http://forum.tinycorelinux.net/index.php/topic,14622.msg83308.html#msg83308So, if you claim to have found a bug in a "How to" more than one year after you have been pointed to it, while in over 3 years none of the more than 4000 users having viewed the same have reported anything, you are not convincing at all when you are not following up and provide necessary evidence.
Generally speaking, bug reports about bugs which cannot be reliably reproduced most likely end up with status "Closed. Can not reproduce." - except in the rare case where there would be indications of a heisenbug.
The subject of this thread needs to be addressed by the TCP 5.1 team. Adding TCP 4.73 to the mix adds a baseline functionality incentive for lowest common denominator resolution ASAP!
This sentence leaves me puzzled, not understanding what any of it could possibly mean...