Tiny Core Base > CorePlus
WiFi Cannot Scan
tinypoodle:
This thread now being 125 posts long, I have not noticed any evidence that udhcpc would be "broken" or "unstable".
In your log attached to Reply #114 everything appears to be perfect to me, not sure what your issue is.
In case you attempt to run any dhcp client on an interface without first having established a fully functional net link, of course there will be no response from any server, that is only expected!
eltone:
--- Quote from: tinypoodle on February 03, 2014, 02:24:06 AM ---This thread now being 125 posts long, I have not noticed any evidence that udhcpc would be "broken" or "unstable".
In your log attached to Reply #114 everything appears to be perfect to me, not sure what your issue is.
In case you attempt to run any dhcp client on an interface without first having established a fully functional net link, of course there will be no response from any server, that is only expected!
--- End quote ---
Dear tinypoodle:
The only CLI instructions needed by PC #2 to post this note:
--- Quote ---$ tce-load -i wireless_tools
$ sudo iwconfig wlan0 essid eltonenetwork
$ sudo iwconfig wlan0 key 6789abcdef
$ sudo iwconfig
$ sudo udhcpc -b -i wlan0 -x hostname:box -p /var/run/udhcpc.wlan0.pid
--- End quote ---
Q: If udhcpc fails to fetch an IP address following a cold boot, using the same CLI indexing, what's the cause? This occurs frequently on two separate PC's!
Sincerely,
eltone
tinypoodle:
Did you check parameters of your link as advized in Reply #113?
bmarkus:
--- Quote from: eltone on February 02, 2014, 07:00:17 PM ---
--- Quote from: tinypoodle on February 01, 2014, 01:45:53 AM ---And if you still don't like udhcpc, you could always use the dhcpcd.tcz extension as in repo instead ;)
--- End quote ---
hi,
Current revision == 6.21.0
dhcpcd.tcz rev. == 5.2.12
--- Quote ---Title: dhcpcd.tcz
Description: A RFC2131 compliant DHCP client.
Version: 5.2.12
Author: Roy Marples
Original-site: http://roy.marples.name/projects/dhcpcd
Copying-policy: BSD
Size: 44K
Extension_by: Arslan S.
Tags: RFC2131 compliant DHCP client.
Comments: This extension is PPI compatible.
Change-log: 2010/07/05 First Version 5.2.5
2010/11/06 Updated to 5.2.8
2011/02/03 Updated to 5.2.10
2011/03/14 Updated to 5.2.11
Current: 2011/04/10 Updated to 5.2.12
--- End quote ---
Please update . . .
eltone
PS. Like/dislike udhcpc; it's broken and needs to be fixed :)
--- End quote ---
Why do you think an update would solve the problem? If you are unhappy with udhcpc you can try dhcp.tcz the official ISC client. But trust others, it IS NOT an udhcp issue!
eltone:
--- Quote from: Juanito on January 26, 2014, 01:27:53 AM ---Remember that extension deps are recursive, there is no need to have most of those extensions named in onboot.lst
--- End quote ---
hi,
I just established udhcpc finding an IP address fiasco linked to invalid extensions named in onboot.lst!
Q: How can invalid onboot.lst extensions get blacklisted from ever existing in onboot.lst?
eltone
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version