WelcomeWelcome | FAQFAQ | DownloadsDownloads | WikiWiki

Author Topic: libxml2.tcz from tcl5 repo not providing shared objects  (Read 2449 times)

Offline ananix

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 174
libxml2.tcz from tcl5 repo not providing shared objects
« on: November 15, 2013, 04:12:12 AM »
Hello, it seems the package in the TCL5 repo does not provide the three shared object files defined under files in its description.

Its needed for the bind package which is then also "broken" in the TCL5 repo.

Online Juanito

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14851
Re: libxml2.tcz from tcl5 repo not providing shared objects
« Reply #1 on: November 15, 2013, 07:27:18 AM »
Which files do you believe are missing?

Offline Rich

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11704
Re: libxml2.tcz from tcl5 repo not providing shared objects
« Reply #2 on: November 15, 2013, 11:41:46 AM »
Hi ananix
I just downloaded and checked the  libxml2.tcz  file from the 5.x repo and it is identical to what's in the 4.x repo. However,
the dependency file for bind.tcz in 5.x only contains:
Code: [Select]
openssl-1.0.0.tczbut under 4.x it contained:
Code: [Select]
libattr.tcz
libcap.tcz
liblzma.tcz
libxml2.tcz
openssl-1.0.0.tcz

Offline bmarkus

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7183
    • My Community Forum
Re: libxml2.tcz from tcl5 repo not providing shared objects
« Reply #3 on: November 15, 2013, 11:58:21 AM »
bind.tcz in 5.x repo missing dependencies, will fix it.
Béla
Ham Radio callsign: HA5DI

"Amateur Radio: The First Technology-Based Social Network."

Offline ananix

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 174
Re: libxml2.tcz from tcl5 repo not providing shared objects
« Reply #4 on: November 18, 2013, 03:54:52 AM »
It was all three shared object files, but I found out of my mistake, I thought I had libxml2 loaded as i had firefox laying on the stick, but not loaded, combined with bind not loading it due to incomplete depend list, I must have messed up some info from the app interface.
So I guess the correct subject would be what bmarkus wrote :)
Thanks for clearing it up for me, i have it all running now.