WelcomeWelcome | FAQFAQ | DownloadsDownloads | WikiWiki

Author Topic: dictclient  (Read 3304 times)

Offline Jason W

  • Retired Admins
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9730
dictclient
« on: May 17, 2009, 08:45:46 PM »
Thanks to Kingdomcome for dictclient:

Code: [Select]
Title: dictclient.tce
Description: dictclient              (TESTING)
Version: 1.0.3.1
Author: John Goerzen
Original-site: http://packages.debian.org/stable/interpreters/python-dictclient
Copying-Policy: GPL2
Size: 8.0K
Extension_by: Kingdomcome
Comments: python dictclient module
Requires python.tc{e,z}l

This extension is PPI compatible
Change-log: ----
Current: 2009/05/16 First Version


Code: [Select]
Title: dictclient.tcz
Description: dictclient              (TESTING)
Version: 1.0.3.1
Author: John Goerzen
Original-site: http://packages.debian.org/stable/interpreters/python-dictclient
Copying-Policy: GPL2
Size: 12.0K
Extension_by: Kingdomcome
Comments: python dictclient module
Requires python.tc{e,z}l
Change-log: ----
Current: 2009/05/16 First Version


Offline jpeters

  • Restricted
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1017
Re: dictclient
« Reply #1 on: May 18, 2009, 10:34:24 AM »
Why is dep python.tc{e,z}l listed 4 times?   
« Last Edit: May 18, 2009, 10:38:22 AM by jpeters »

Offline Kingdomcome

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 286
Re: dictclient
« Reply #2 on: May 18, 2009, 02:36:13 PM »
Another oversight on my part.  I can resubmit with a corrected dep.  I have written a generic build script that I used to create the extensions I submitted in a bundle and since submitting, I have found a few errors in my script.  I tried to check over everything and make sure it was ready for the repo, but apparently I missed a few things.  As this was my first contribution, I hope the community will bear with me a bit I will try to clean up my mistakes and also share the generic build script once the bugs have been ironed out.

Offline Jason W

  • Retired Admins
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9730
Re: dictclient
« Reply #3 on: May 18, 2009, 05:20:41 PM »
I can correct a dep file quickly by logging into ibiblio, normally no need to resubmit.

Your extension submission was as thorough as I have seen - included list files, links to source, (TESTING) label, build scripts, clear indication of what is for 1.x and 2.x, and so on.  Those kind of things save me (and sometimes the submitter too) a lot of time.  Overall the community is doing very well with this, but I wanted to make a mention of yours as everything was place to make quick work of posting a large batch of extensions.


Offline jpeters

  • Restricted
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1017
Re: dictclient
« Reply #4 on: May 18, 2009, 06:03:08 PM »
I can correct a dep file quickly by logging into ibiblio, normally no need to resubmit.

Your extension submission was as thorough as I have seen - included list files, links to source, (TESTING) label, build scripts, clear indication of what is for 1.x and 2.x, and so on.  Those kind of things save me (and sometimes the submitter too) a lot of time. 


Maybe a little more description in the wiki on submitting extensions?

Offline Jason W

  • Retired Admins
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9730
Re: dictclient
« Reply #5 on: May 18, 2009, 06:44:45 PM »
I've put it all in the guidelines thread, but it is spread around through the posts in there. I don't have direct access to the wiki but I will draw up a document and get it all in one place.

Offline ^thehatsrule^

  • Retired Admins
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1726
Re: dictclient
« Reply #6 on: May 18, 2009, 07:27:32 PM »
(OT) The wiki actually points to the forum thread as well.

Offline jpeters

  • Restricted
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1017
Re: dictclient
« Reply #7 on: May 18, 2009, 07:34:55 PM »
(OT) The wiki actually points to the forum thread as well.

That's clear....but as Jason indicated, having it in one place (ie, coherent doc) would probably yield better results....
« Last Edit: May 18, 2009, 09:53:11 PM by jpeters »