WelcomeWelcome | FAQFAQ | DownloadsDownloads | WikiWiki

Author Topic: [SOLVED]Running a script in Terminal  (Read 18403 times)

Online Rich

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11628
Re: [SOLVED]Running a script in Terminal
« Reply #45 on: March 11, 2013, 03:51:45 PM »
Hi Paulo
Well I didn't watch it, and you don't know that bmarkus did either. But your right, it is up to bmarkus, and that gets
us back to the initial point:

  It's the difference between taking it for granted someone must do something for you as opposed to asking if they
  would do something for you.

And on that note I'll drop it.

@tinypoodle: This machine has no sound capability, so videos are kind of pointless.

Offline Paulo

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 139
Re: [SOLVED]Running a script in Terminal
« Reply #46 on: March 11, 2013, 04:05:19 PM »
Rich

I never demanded that bmarkus do anything, you assumed that I did and it's certainly not my fault that for whatever
reasons you don't/can't watch youtube content and hence did not get the spirit of my post.

I shall now drop it too and let's leave it at we agree to disagree.

Offline bmarkus

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7183
    • My Community Forum
Re: [SOLVED]Running a script in Terminal
« Reply #47 on: March 12, 2013, 03:06:02 AM »
@Lee
Very funny video, thanks for sharing.  ;D

@bmarkus

You gonna have to rub some bacon on it as hug.bac is required for GUI apps.
Will the compiled version still work if one adds:
INCLUDE hug.bac
in the Basic source?
Sorry for asking as I have never used the compiled version of BaCon, only the Bash version.

No need to include wrappers in compiler (converter) source, they are used in applications only Same for HUG which is the GTK wrapper. Add to your program if creating a GTK+ application.
Béla
Ham Radio callsign: HA5DI

"Amateur Radio: The First Technology-Based Social Network."

Offline Paulo

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 139
Re: [SOLVED]Running a script in Terminal
« Reply #48 on: March 12, 2013, 04:31:57 AM »
Thank you bmarkus.