Community gatherings on Freenode at #tinycorelinux (webchat)
What, if anything, does "iconv --list" give on the two systems?
Quote from: curaga on January 03, 2013, 03:44:56 PMJust a guess, perhaps the older mtools didn't have the conversion feature.In reply #3 (Further Tests) the older mtools was used together with the newer gparted and the current kernel. This was an attempt to identify if the needs of mtools had changed. Is there a way to directly enquire of the installed mtools whether the conversion feature is required?
Just a guess, perhaps the older mtools didn't have the conversion feature.
Could be from gparted and not mtools then.
Quote from: tinypoodle on January 03, 2013, 07:27:33 PMWondering what would happen if you would omit loading mtools, if gparted would not just fall back on dosfstools for label function.This does not work. Both dosfstools and mtools are required. If it had worked it would leave the cause of the discrepancy unidentified.
Wondering what would happen if you would omit loading mtools, if gparted would not just fall back on dosfstools for label function.
/usr/local/sbin/gparted: error while loading shared libraries: /usr/local/sbin/gparted: invalid ELF header
linux-gate.so.1 => (0xb7732000) libparted.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libparted.so.2 (0xb76f1000) libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0xb75e6000) libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0xb75e2000) libblkid.so.1 => /lib/libblkid.so.1 (0xb75c7000) libuuid.so.1 => /lib/libuuid.so.1 (0xb75c2000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb7733000)
Here are ldd reports from the TC 4.7.2 system. Gparted returns an error. Is this significant?
ldd /usr/local/sbin/gpartedbin