WelcomeWelcome | FAQFAQ | DownloadsDownloads | WikiWiki
« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Is memory use the only reason for no syslogd by default??  (Read 2051 times)

Offline ToasterKing

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 14
Is memory use the only reason for no syslogd by default??
« on: June 27, 2011, 05:29:11 PM »
I believe by default the busybox syslogd rotates files at 200KB and keeps a single backup.

Before I turn syslogd on by default on all my systems, is there something other than 400KB of memory at stake?  /var/log isn't on persistent storage, so no issues with exhausting flash write cycles or anything, performance impact is minimal...

Maybe just not judged worth it because the log won't survive a reboot?
Logged

Offline curaga

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11044
Re: Is memory use the only reason for no syslogd by default??
« Reply #1 on: June 28, 2011, 03:17:41 AM »
Quote
Maybe just not judged worth it because the log won't survive a reboot?

That, and we should not run unnecessary daemons by default. I think we only run udev on a base boot.
Logged
The only barriers that can stop you are the ones you create yourself.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »