WelcomeWelcome | FAQFAQ | DownloadsDownloads | WikiWiki

Author Topic: 3.x file.tcz is only 2 bytes.  (Read 2415 times)

Offline gerald_clark

  • TinyCore Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4254
3.x file.tcz is only 2 bytes.
« on: September 30, 2010, 07:37:40 AM »
There is also a file.tcz.md5. file in addition to the file.tcz.md5.txt .

Offline Jason W

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9730
Re: 3.x file.tcz is only 2 bytes.
« Reply #1 on: September 30, 2010, 07:51:16 AM »
Oops, I was testing my announcement posting routine, and the file.tcz got copied over unintentionally.  I have copies of it at home, and I will be able to upload it at aroune 8pm EST.

Curaga or Juanito, if you see this today and could upload a copy of file.tcz I would appreciate it.  

Or if someone could send in a copy of file.tcz and it's md5 file to the gmail account I will post it from work.
« Last Edit: September 30, 2010, 07:54:06 AM by Jason W »

Offline tinypoodle

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3857
Re: 3.x file.tcz is only 2 bytes.
« Reply #2 on: September 30, 2010, 08:15:00 AM »
Oops, I was testing my announcement posting routine, and the file.tcz got copied over unintentionally.

And here I thought this was the ultimate "proof of concept" of the minimalism of TC.  ;D

If the info in in 3.x repo is correct, then it is the version for 2.x, in this case perhaps you could just copy it over from 2.x repos?

(Running 2.10 here, so I guess no sense in mailing my local copy)
« Last Edit: September 30, 2010, 09:47:37 AM by tinypoodle »
"Software gets slower faster than hardware gets faster." Niklaus Wirth - A Plea for Lean Software (1995)

Offline roberts

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7361
  • Founder Emeritus
Re: 3.x file.tcz is only 2 bytes.
« Reply #3 on: September 30, 2010, 08:16:17 AM »
file.tcz restored.
10+ Years Contributing to Linux Open Source Projects.

Offline Jason W

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9730
Re: 3.x file.tcz is only 2 bytes.
« Reply #4 on: September 30, 2010, 09:11:25 AM »
Thanks Robert.

tinypoodle -
You are right in that I could have copied it from the 2.x repo.  I am in the middle of the workday with other stuff on my mind, so I overlooked the simple solution of copying from 2.x.