WelcomeWelcome | FAQFAQ | DownloadsDownloads | WikiWiki

Author Topic: logically; standard TCL (x86_64-bit) must be XORG in iso !!! :)  (Read 307 times)

Offline xor

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 190
logically; standard TCL (x86_64-bit) must be XORG in iso !!! :)

logically; Is the standard TCL (x86_64-bit) not need to be XORG in the iso !? XVESA does not offer a 64-bit option. ! :(

Online Juanito

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10882
Re: logically; standard TCL (x86_64-bit) must be XORG in iso !!! :)
« Reply #1 on: May 24, 2019, 02:04:20 AM »
The 64-bit iso uses the other tinyx server, Xfbdev.

[and please do not post the same thing multiple times]

Offline xor

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 190
Re: logically; standard TCL (x86_64-bit) must be XORG in iso !!! :)
« Reply #2 on: May 24, 2019, 02:07:19 AM »
The 64-bit iso ,,

[and please do not post the same thing multiple times]

the same questions; repeatedly asked.

the same problems; again, again, is.
« Last Edit: May 24, 2019, 02:09:03 AM by xor »

Offline coreplayer2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2976
Re: logically; standard TCL (x86_64-bit) must be XORG in iso !!! :)
« Reply #3 on: May 24, 2019, 02:09:19 AM »
XOR.    Sorry but I don’t understand why you have such a problem with the repo, extensions are user contributed, if you need an extension then make it yourself and share using the available resources.

Corpure64 iso has Xfbdev extension instead of Xvesa


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline xor

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 190
Re: logically; standard TCL (x86_64-bit) must be XORG in iso !!! :)
« Reply #4 on: May 24, 2019, 02:13:02 AM »
XOR.    Sorry but I don’t understand why you have such a problem with the repo, extensions are user contributed, if you need an extension then make it yourself and share using the available resources.

Corpure64 iso has Xfbdev extension instead of Xvesa


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

as logic; faulty distribution,

software usually wants xorg.
it makes more sense to add

because 64-bit systems are modern systems.

In 64-bit systems; especially table top
Energy consumption ecological overview is incorrect
what is important is the time consumption

Time is wasting too much.

software usually wants xorg.
it makes more sense to add
« Last Edit: May 24, 2019, 02:17:32 AM by xor »

Online PDP-8

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 408
Re: logically; standard TCL (x86_64-bit) must be XORG in iso !!! :)
« Reply #5 on: May 24, 2019, 03:07:16 AM »
Then you merely add xorg and drivers yourself and build TC to what you want it to be.

I think maybe you misunderstand the ethos behind TC.  *YOU* build it from the ground up because user's needs are different.

Personally, I *love* TC, it just sounds like perhaps this isn't the right distro for you at this time.

That's a UNIX book! - cool  -- Garth

Offline coreplayer2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2976
logically; standard TCL (x86_64-bit) must be XORG in iso !!! [emoji4]
« Reply #6 on: May 24, 2019, 03:08:11 AM »
Hello xor,  I disagree..  it makes no sense to add a heavyweight Xorg extension to an iso when Xfbdev meets the requirements of the majority




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline core-user

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 161
  • Linux since 1999
Re: logically; standard TCL (x86_64-bit) must be XORG in iso !!! :)
« Reply #7 on: May 24, 2019, 10:48:28 AM »
Quote
as logic; faulty distribution,

Logic suggests to me that you are looking at the wrong distro for what you want to achieve, you would be better off looking at other light weight distros.  ;)
AMD, ARM, & Intel.