WelcomeWelcome | FAQFAQ | DownloadsDownloads | WikiWiki

Author Topic: Recently updated list still work?  (Read 4532 times)

Offline vinnie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1187
  • HandMace informatic works
Recently updated list still work?
« on: February 01, 2013, 10:20:42 PM »
It is some time that I notice the malfunction of these lists, I did not ask before because I was aware of the problems with the repository.
However personally I looked at those lists very often, but not anymore because they return me a feeling of abandonment.
My request is if these lists may be put into a regular working situation again, thanks  :)

Offline Juanito

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14516
Re: Recently updated list still work?
« Reply #1 on: February 02, 2013, 03:45:04 AM »

Offline SamK

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 713
Re: Recently updated list still work?
« Reply #2 on: February 02, 2013, 04:14:28 AM »
'Seems OK?

http://tinycorelinux.net/4.x/updates/updatelist.txt
It does not list the recent addition of gnome-mplayer.tcz (1.0.7), although it can be downloaded from the repo.

Offline vinnie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1187
  • HandMace informatic works
Re: Recently updated list still work?
« Reply #3 on: February 03, 2013, 02:46:37 AM »
it is not ok, many packages that are placed are not present.
For example the most recent vlc-full.tcz

Offline gutmensch

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 605
  • I can make it disappear, have no fear!
    • remembrance blog
Re: Recently updated list still work?
« Reply #4 on: February 03, 2013, 04:14:22 AM »
No need to worry, in the process of moving to a new mirror I changed the updatelist script to create updates for tcz files in a proper directory below the corresponding VERSION/ARCH/tcz/updates/ path, e.g. check out:

http://repo.tinycorelinux.net/4.x/x86/tcz/updates/updatelist.txt

Since we are now somehow supporting 4 archs, I felt cluttering one file with all archs wasn't that productive. ;-)
If I seem unduly clear to you, you must have misunderstood what I said. (Alan Greenspan)

Offline SamK

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 713
Re: Recently updated list still work?
« Reply #5 on: February 03, 2013, 06:00:00 AM »
No need to worry, in the process of moving to a new mirror I changed the updatelist script to create updates for tcz files in a proper directory below the corresponding VERSION/ARCH/tcz/updates/ path, e.g. check out:

http://repo.tinycorelinux.net/4.x/x86/tcz/updates/updatelist.txt

Since we are now somehow supporting 4 archs, I felt cluttering one file with all archs wasn't that productive. ;-)
How about changing the link "Recently Updated TCZs" on http://tinycorelinux.net/downloads.html

Offline vinnie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1187
  • HandMace informatic works
Re: Recently updated list still work?
« Reply #6 on: February 04, 2013, 12:39:36 AM »
yes, it is a step forward what you have done, but as he says samK, you should update the link on the download page.
P.s. I tried http://tinycorelinux.net/4.x/x86/scm/updates but does not seem to exist

Offline roberts

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7361
  • Founder Emeritus
Re: Recently updated list still work?
« Reply #7 on: February 05, 2013, 10:21:32 PM »
No need to worry, in the process of moving to a new mirror I changed the updatelist script to create updates for tcz files in a proper directory below the corresponding VERSION/ARCH/tcz/updates/ path, e.g. check out:

http://repo.tinycorelinux.net/4.x/x86/tcz/updates/updatelist.txt

Since we are now somehow supporting 4 archs, I felt cluttering one file with all archs wasn't that productive. ;-)
How about changing the link "Recently Updated TCZs" on http://tinycorelinux.net/downloads.html
link "Recently Updated TCZs" updated!
Also added Recently Updated Pure 64 TCZs to the "Other Core Ports" page.
10+ Years Contributing to Linux Open Source Projects.

Offline vinnie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1187
  • HandMace informatic works
Re: Recently updated list still work?
« Reply #8 on: February 06, 2013, 05:49:09 AM »
thanks roberts and gutmensch