WelcomeWelcome | FAQFAQ | DownloadsDownloads | WikiWiki

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]
91
TCE Q&A Forum / Re: tinycore vs tinycore64
« Last post by Juanito on June 22, 2016, 09:06:14 AM »
core and core64 can only use 32-bit extensions

corepure64 can only use 64-bit extensions
92
TCE Q&A Forum / Re: tinycore vs tinycore64
« Last post by andyj on June 22, 2016, 09:03:09 AM »
I'm guessing it's not multilib? Meaning you can't mix 32 and 64 bit apps, it's one or the other?
93
TCE Q&A Forum / Re: tinycore vs tinycore64
« Last post by Juanito on June 22, 2016, 07:38:05 AM »
You can have three versions of tinycore:

core - 32-bit kernel modules + 32-bit apps
core64 - 64-bit kernel modules + 32-bit apps
corepure64 - 64-bit kernel modules + 64-bit apps

core - core.gz (or rootfs.gz + modules.gz) + vmlinuz
core64 - rootfs.gz + modules64.gz + vmlinuz64
corepure64 - corepure64.gz (or rootfs64.gz + modules64.gz) + vmlinuz64

The difference between alsa-modules-4.2.9-tinycore64.tcz and alsa-modules-4.2.9-tinycore.tcz is that the former contains 64-bit kernel modules and the latter contains 32-bit kernel modules.
94
TCE Q&A Forum / tinycore vs tinycore64
« Last post by wysiwyg on June 22, 2016, 07:05:42 AM »
Good morning everyone!  I have been looking through some of the extensions for the 32bit version of TC and noticed that there are two different packages for things like alsa-modules.  Whats the difference between alsa-modules-4.2.9-tinycore64.tcz and alsa-modules-4.2.9-tinycore.tcz?  I would assume that the former is for the 64bit version of the OS whereas the latter is for 32bit, but then why is it in the 32bit repo?

Thanks,
Dave
95
Hi,

I have some custom sce. When I sce-load its in dCore-trusty 2016.03.03 their icons appear properly in the wbar.
But with the latest release 2016.05.24 and the newer release-candidates the icons don't appear in wbar, only when I exit to system and then execute startx they come back to the wbar.

And also there are no entries in the applications menu until I exit to system and return to X.
96
I usually start out with making libc6 sce package. Once i have that, i try to generate e.g. mc package with -d feature.

In the dialog where user can select dependencies for package, if the list comprises of only one entry, it's impossible to proceed by simply pressing enter. Once the list has intially 2 or more entries, everything works fine.
97
TCB Q&A Forum / Re: Video driver problem
« Last post by pq5190362 on June 22, 2016, 05:42:43 AM »
As per:
Quote
Version bumped to 0.4.901
This version is Version 0.5 RC2 (Release Candidate 2). If there
are no major regressions from Version 0.3.3 or 0.4.0, this version
will be released as Version 0.5 shortly.

..maybe it's better to wait a day or two for 0.5?

Yes, might be a good idea.

I installed system again an every thing works well now.

But you are using VGA now and DVI still does not work, right?
98
TCE Talk / Re: TCE extension name and executable mismatch...
« Last post by Misalf on June 22, 2016, 04:20:37 AM »
These patches are slightly different to those I just posted. I moved the "&" to tc-functions so ondemand can stay as it is.

ondemand  and  tc-config  from
http://tinycorelinux.net/7.x/x86_64/release/distribution_files/rootfs64.gz
are looking good. I've used them to create the attached diffs.
99
TCB Q&A Forum / Re: Video driver problem
« Last post by Hampelmann91 on June 22, 2016, 03:11:38 AM »
Hello,
yes it starts rdesktop.
I installed system again an every thing works well now.
It must have been my mistake.

So my problem is solved and I have to say THANK YOU! :D
100
TCB Q&A Forum / Re: Video driver problem
« Last post by Juanito on June 22, 2016, 02:51:09 AM »
startup scripts belong in bootlocal.sh or bootsync.sh

scripts in ~/X.d are for things that require X to be started, for example flit or conky
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]