WelcomeWelcome | FAQFAQ | DownloadsDownloads | WikiWiki

Author Topic: empty.tcz bug ?  (Read 8186 times)

Offline roberts

  • Retired Admins
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7361
  • Founder Emeritus
Re: empty.tcz bug ?
« Reply #15 on: February 22, 2011, 09:42:58 PM »
I will look into this when I return from Scale9x.
10+ Years Contributing to Linux Open Source Projects.

Offline Arslan S.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 825
Re: empty.tcz bug ?
« Reply #16 on: February 23, 2011, 04:55:08 AM »
empty extensions are called meta extensions, in the case of a meta extension i put a single file in it as a workaround

see kdemultimedia.tcz for example

Offline hiro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1229
Re: empty.tcz bug ?
« Reply #17 on: February 23, 2011, 10:01:17 AM »
in fact making an empty extension preferable to a dummy file/dir.
Don't put that file in there, Arslan.

Offline ioannis

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 5
Re: empty.tcz bug ?
« Reply #18 on: February 20, 2013, 02:55:01 PM »
So i guess using usr is the final way of creating an empty tcz ?

original-modules-3.0.21-tinycore.tcz is a completely empty tcz (no files or folders in filesystem) which reports error on mount
Has anyone run submitqc4 on all extensions in the library to ensure consistency of application ?

Also in tce-load line#148 calling sudo umount could fix the umount error reported on empty extensions...