WelcomeWelcome | FAQFAQ | DownloadsDownloads | WikiWiki
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Down

Author Topic: Best TinyCore (microcore) alternative for ARM?  (Read 5460 times)

Offline caminati

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 170
    • Homepage
Re: Best TinyCore (microcore) alternative for ARM?
« Reply #45 on: March 11, 2012, 11:45:48 PM »
Quote from: curaga on December 21, 2011, 10:56:58 AM
On uclibc, while there's (so far) no binary-only software on ARM to worry about, uclibc still loses in features and performance (and has a bit more bugs). On these grounds I would recommend against it.

What about musl? Anyone have remarks similar to the one above for it?
http://www.etalabs.net/compare_libcs.html
Logged

Offline curaga

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6947
Re: Best TinyCore (microcore) alternative for ARM?
« Reply #46 on: March 12, 2012, 07:46:05 AM »
musl lacks many features, and focuses only on standard-correct small functions.

This means it occasionally breaks software that works fine on uclibc, due to some nonstandard-but-defacto usage for example.
Logged
The only barriers that can stop you are the ones you create yourself.

Offline caminati

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 170
    • Homepage
Re: Best TinyCore (microcore) alternative for ARM?
« Reply #47 on: March 12, 2012, 07:54:26 AM »
Quote from: curaga on March 12, 2012, 07:46:05 AM
musl lacks many features, and focuses only on standard-correct small functions.

This means it occasionally breaks software that works fine on uclibc, due to some nonstandard-but-defacto usage for example.

Thanks, not being competent I miss these notions, which are, however, quite interesting.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Up
« previous next »